| Easy-J | |
| An Introduction to the World’s most | |
| Remarkable Programming Language | |
| by Linda Alvord and Norman Thomson | |
| October 2002 | |
| Contents | |
| Introduction | |
| Section 1. Getting Started | |
| Section 2. Introducing Simulation | |
| Section 3. Defining your own verbs | |
| Section 4. Fitting equations to data | |
| Section 5. Boxes and Records | |
| Section 6. Investigating Possibilities | |
| Section 7. Editing, System Facilities and Scripts | |
| Section 8. Drawing graphs | |
| Section 9. Rank | |
| Index | |
| Vocabulary | |
| Introduction | |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 13 | |
| 16 | |
| 24 | |
| 26 | |
| 29 | |
| 33 | |
| 36 | |
| 39 | |
| 43 | |
| 44 | |
| J is both a language and an exceptional programming package which provides a | |
| highly concise notation for specifying much that is done routinely in the day to day | |
| business of computing, such as sorting, searching, updating and restructuring data. Its | |
| inventor and designer is Dr. K.E. Iverson, who also devised the language APL, out of | |
| which J developed. The first J interpreters appeared around 1990, since when the | |
| language has grown in popularity and application, particularly in the world of finance, | |
| where its conciseness and power for rapid algorithm development is highly valued. | |
| Amazingly, this algorithm-rich software is available free by download from | |
| www.jsoftware.com | |
| a download which takes only a few minutes, following which installation is easy. | |
| J also has many enthusiasts in education, where it can be a powerful motivator on | |
| account of the clarity with which users can express their intentions on a computer. | |
| The objective of this tutorial is to give a brief introduction which will either | |
| encourage the user to perform the above download and discover that the claims which | |
| are made on this page are in no way understated, or, if the download has already been | |
| performed, encourage him or her to take the first steps up the J learning ladder into a | |
| world of discovery and delight. It is impossible in a pamphlet of this size to cover | |
| anything other than a tiny part of the facilities which J affords. However, that need be | |
| no disadvantage, since the J system is fully self-describing through a comprehensive | |
| Help facility, through Labs (that is prepared sessions) which can be invoked by the | |
| Studio drop down menu, and through libraries of scripts and packages which | |
| encapsulate the work of many previous users. Once the topics in this tutorial have | |
| been grasped, the user should find little difficulty in extending his or her knowledge | |
| both by exploiting the help features listed above and by direct exploration on the | |
| keyboard. Further, the J language is totally consistent across all the many platforms | |
| on which it is now available, and a vigorous Internet forum (forum@ jsoftware.com) | |
| is perhaps the best support mechanism of all. | |
| 1 | |
| SECTION 1 : GETTING STARTED | |
| This tutorial assumes that the reader has either | |
| (i) successfully installed J on a computer and is ready to use it; or | |
| (ii) is interested in J as a vehicle for reading and writing algorithms and wishes to | |
| obtain something of its flavour prior to using it on a computer. | |
| J in its simplest use acts just like a desk calculator. If you are working at a terminal, | |
| type the following input, pressing the “enter” key after each line : | |
| 3+4 | |
| 7 | |
| 5*20 | |
| 100 | |
| Symbols like + and * for plus and times in the above phrases are called verbs and | |
| represent functions. You may have more than one verb in a J phrase, in which case it | |
| is constructed like a sentence in simple English by reading from left to right, that is | |
| 4+6%2 means 4 added to whatever follows, namely 6 divided by 2 : | |
| 4+6%2 | |
| 7 | |
| Here is another phrase : | |
| 4%6+2 | |
| 0.5 | |
| In a similar way this means 4 divided by everything to the right, namely 6+2 which is | |
| 8. Hence 4%6+2 evaluates to 4%8 = 0.5. Notice how the verbs themselves are | |
| executed in left to right order, that is the rightmost verb + is executed before the | |
| leftmost, %. The simplicity of these rules for reading phrases on the one hand and | |
| executing them on the other avoids the need for artificial rules of precedence such as | |
| apply in ordinary arithmetic to state that for example * has priority over +. | |
| Pursuing the analogy with English, the sentence “Jack visited the house which he | |
| built” is read from left to right, but in order to “execute” it you must do the “build” | |
| first, so that you can properly identify which house was visited. | |
| The repertoire of basic arithmetic verbs + - * % in J is completed with the | |
| power verb ^ : | |
| 4^3 | |
| 64 | |
| If you wish to change the order of execution of verbs, you may do so in the normal | |
| way by using parentheses : | |
| 2 | |
| 1+2%3 | |
| 1.66667 | |
| (1+2)%3 | |
| 1 | |
| You might wonder why the first of these answers was represented to 6-digit precision | |
| rather than any other. The reason is that print precision is controlled by using a so- | |
| called foreign conjunction – foreign because it “belongs” to the system rather than to | |
| the J language proper. The default value is 6 can be confirmed by typing | |
| 9!:10 '' | |
| 6 | |
| NB. get the current print precision | |
| and reset to other values, say 4, by : | |
| (9!:11)4 | |
| 1+2%3 | |
| 1.667 | |
| NB. set print precision | |
| You should think of 9!:10 and 9!:11 as further verbs which perform system | |
| functions within the J workspace environment. The above lines also introduce the | |
| symbol NB. which indicates that everything to its right on a line should be read as a | |
| comment. | |
| The underbar symbol _ is used to indicate “negative”, and is an inseparable part of a | |
| negative number. You may not leave a space between the underbar and the digits of a | |
| number. | |
| 3-8 | |
| _5 | |
| 3-_8 | |
| 11 | |
| Within the workspace, data is stored by assigning values to variables with names | |
| chosen by the user, subject to the requirement that the first character in such a name | |
| must be alphabetic : | |
| b=.4 | |
| value1=._0.3 | |
| value1=.1.6 | |
| NB. decimals <1 must have leading 0 | |
| NB. a second assignment to value1 | |
| Single-value items such as the above are known as “scalars”. Entry of a name by | |
| itself causes the most recently assigned value of the named variable to be output : | |
| b | |
| 4 | |
| value1 | |
| 1.6 | |
| 3 | |
| However, J is much more than just a calculator, since arbitrarily large lists of numbers | |
| (which are also sometimes called “vectors”) can be assigned : | |
| c=.3 1 4 0.5 _2 | |
| d=.4 0 3 _1.2 7 | |
| Again the underbar symbol is used to express negative numbers. Adding two lists | |
| means that corresponding items in each are added: | |
| c+d | |
| 7 1 7 _0.7 5 | |
| c*d | |
| 12 0 12 _0.6 _14 | |
| d%c | |
| 1.333 0 0.75 _2.4 _3.5 | |
| Dividing c by d involves a division by 0 in the second position. The result of this is | |
| infinity, denoted by a single underbar : | |
| d%c | |
| 0.75 _ 1.333 _0.4167 _0.2857 | |
| There are some list operations which are not meaningful, for example adding a list | |
| with five items to one with only three. If you attempt to do this the result is as | |
| follows : | |
| c+1 2 3 | |
| |length error | |
| | c +1 2 3 | |
| Three observations should be noted about this error message : | |
| (a) it is concise; | |
| (b) the word “length” gives insight into the nature of the error; and | |
| (c) the added blank spaces indicate the exact point in the phrase where, | |
| reading from right to left, the error was detected. | |
| J allows complex numbers, so for some verbs such as square root, denoted by the | |
| digraph %:, may have results with a number separated without spaces by the letter j. | |
| The number 0j1.414 below indicates a real component of 0 and an imaginary | |
| component of 1.414. | |
| %:c | |
| 1.732 1 2 0.7071 0j1.414 | |
| NB. square roots of c | |
| The natural logarithm verb ^. produces logarithms to the base e, and can also | |
| generate results containing complex numbers : | |
| ^.c | |
| 1.099 0 1.386 _0.6931 0.6931j3.142 | |
| NB. natural logarithms | |
| 4 | |
| Logarithms to base 10 are obtained by : | |
| 10^.c | |
| 0.4771 0 0.6021 _0.301 0.301j1.364 | |
| and similarly for logarithms to any other number bases, e.g. 2 : | |
| 2^.1 2 4 8 20 | |
| 0 1 2 3 4.322 | |
| If you wish to count or tally # the number of items in a list, type : | |
| #c | |
| 5 | |
| The verb # is treated like any other verb, so 2 plus the tally of items in c is : | |
| 2+#c | |
| 7 | |
| The verb from { references items in a list. The fourth item in list c is : | |
| 3{c | |
| 0.5 | |
| You probably expected the answer _2; what you must take into account is that items | |
| in lists in J are always indexed from 0. A list can be used to select from a list : | |
| 0 3 4{c | |
| 3 0.5 _2 | |
| NB. 0 3 4 is a list of indices | |
| Data need not be numeric – in the next example a list of characters is defined, and the | |
| characters themselves are tallied: | |
| cv=.'J is useful.' | |
| cv | |
| J is useful. | |
| #cv | |
| 12 | |
| cv can be indexed by a numeric list containing repeated items : | |
| 0 7 10 10 2 7 3{cv | |
| Jellies | |
| In J a scalar is a single data item which can be either a number, or a literal character, | |
| which in turn may be a letter of the alphabet, digit or symbol. A numeric scalar item | |
| is the value of the number represented by the combination of its characters, sign and | |
| decimal point. Literal characters are enclosed in single quotes. Thus the tally of the | |
| literal items in the representation of the single number _3.875 is : | |
| 5 | |
| #'_3.875' | |
| 6 | |
| A tally of the number as a numeric scalar is : | |
| #_3.875 | |
| 1 | |
| Some symbols such as # represent two different verbs. In general, a verb has data on | |
| both its left and right, called left and right arguments. Such a verb is called a dyadic | |
| verb. A verb with only a right argument is described as monadic, thus square root and | |
| tally are monadic verbs. As a dyadic verb # is called copy. The left argument of | |
| copy is the number of copies of each item in the right argument : | |
| 3#c | |
| 3 3 3 1 1 1 4 4 4 0.5 0.5 0.5 _2 _2 _2 | |
| The dyadic verb reshape verb $ can create what appear to be matrices, but which are | |
| in fact lists of lists. The left argument provides the structure and the right argument | |
| gives the data. The data is reused by “wrapping round” : | |
| matrix=.3 4$c | |
| 3 1 4 0.5 | |
| _2 3 1 4 | |
| 0.5 _2 3 1 | |
| The monadic verb shape of $ gives the structure of the right argument and is always a | |
| list : | |
| $matrix | |
| 3 4 | |
| #matrix | |
| 3 | |
| Note that tally counts only the first item in the shape, that is it counts at the topmost | |
| level only. For simple lists like c and d their tally and shape look identical. | |
| Arithmetic verbs (the words “verb” and “function” can often be used interchangeably) | |
| may also have one scalar argument and the other a list : | |
| c | |
| 3 1 4 0.5 _2 | |
| b | |
| 4 | |
| c+b | |
| 7 5 8 4.5 2 | |
| c*2 | |
| 6 2 8 1 _4 | |
| 6 | |
| Technically what happens is that the scalar is replicated (that is extended) to become a | |
| list of matching length, and item by item function application takes place as before. | |
| Use the verb append, represented by a comma, to join lists and scalars : | |
| c,b | |
| 3 1 4 0.5 _2 4 | |
| Arithmetic verbs have monadic as well as dyadic forms, for example : | |
| +b | |
| 4 | |
| -b | |
| _4 | |
| Monadic + (called conjugate) does not change the value of its argument, provided that | |
| it is numeric and not complex. However, it can be useful in simultaneously | |
| calculating and displaying a value : | |
| +z=.4+6%2 | |
| 7 | |
| Monadic minus is called negate , and monadic * is called signum, which returns 1 for | |
| a positive value of its argument, _1 for a negative value, and 0 for a zero value : | |
| *b | |
| 1 | |
| *-b | |
| _1 | |
| *b-b | |
| 0 | |
| Monadic % is the function reciprocal : | |
| %b | |
| 0.25 | |
| The two digraph symbols <. and >. double up as minimum and maximum in their | |
| dyadic form, and as ceiling and floor (that is, next integer above and below) in their | |
| monadic form. Like the arithmetic verbs, they can be applied to lists as well as to | |
| scalars. Here are some examples : | |
| +value1=.1.6 | |
| 1.6 | |
| >.value1 | |
| 2 | |
| <.value1 | |
| 1 | |
| b>.value1 | |
| 4 | |
| NB. round up value1 | |
| NB. round down value1 | |
| NB. maximum of b and value1 | |
| 7 | |
| b<.value1 | |
| 1.6 | |
| c | |
| 3 1 4 0.5 _2 | |
| d | |
| 4 0 3 _1.2 7 | |
| c>.d | |
| 4 1 4 0.5 7 | |
| 0>.d | |
| 4 0 3 0 7 | |
| NB. minimum of b and value1 | |
| NB. c and d as defined above | |
| NB. item by item maxima | |
| NB. d with negative items | |
| NB. replaced by zero | |
| This is a good point at which to interrupt the description of J verbs with some | |
| elementary arithmetic examples which show how J can be applied to simple problems. | |
| (a) Suppose you want to express 1 foot 4½ inches as a percentage of first 2 feet, then | |
| 2 ft. 6 ins., 3 ft., 6 ft., and 10 ft., in each case rounding the answer to the nearest | |
| percentage above. Using a list allows all five calculations to be done in parallel : | |
| >.100*(1+4.5%12)%2 2.5 3 6 10 | |
| 69 55 46 23 14 | |
| (b) An Indian is said to have sold Manhattan Island to white settlers in 1650 for 12 | |
| dollars. What would be the dollar value of this sum in the year 2000 if invested at | |
| compound interest of 3%, 4%, 5%, 10% ? | |
| (9!:11)16 | |
| NB. set print precision to 16 | |
| <.12*(1+0.03 0.04 0.05 0.1)^(2000-1650) | |
| 373430 10986263 312921872 3686557834057256 | |
| (c) A body falling from rest for y seconds drops a height of ½gt2 cms. where g=981 | |
| cm./sec2. Find the height fallen after 1,2,4,8,16 secs., then the velocities v at these | |
| gh2 | |
| times (the formula for velocity is v = | |
| ). | |
| (9!:11)6 | |
| NB. set print precision to 6 | |
| +ht=.0.5*981*1 2 4 8 16^2 | |
| 490.5 1962 7848 31392 125568 | |
| +vel=.%:2*981*ht | |
| 981 1962 3924 7848 15696 | |
| Returning to the description of J verbs, the next one to be introduced is | which in its | |
| monadic form means absolute value, and in its dyadic form the remainder or residue | |
| when the right argument is divided by the left argument : | |
| |c | |
| 3 1 4 0.5 2 | |
| 1.6|b | |
| 0.8 | |
| 8 | |
| Frequently one wants to add, multiply etc. all the items in a list. This process is called | |
| insertion, and the notation for doing it is | |
| +/c | |
| 6.5 | |
| */c | |
| _12 | |
| -/c | |
| 3.5 | |
| The last example deserves a little more attention. A more complete description of | |
| insertion is that the symbol / represents an adverb which when applied to a verb | |
| modifies its behaviour in some way. The modification for / consists of placing the | |
| verb between each item in the list so that +/v is equivalent to | |
| 3 + 1 + 4 + 0.5 + _2 | |
| and right to left execution (or alternatively left to right reading) takes place as usual. | |
| Try this with – in the gaps, and it will immediately become clear why -/c is 3.5. | |
| You will notice also that 3.5 is the alternating sum of c, that is the sum of the items in | |
| odd-numbered positions (first, third, etc.) minus the sum of items in even-numbered | |
| items. Following a similar argument, %/c is the alternating product of c. Perhaps | |
| even more interesting is the effect of putting >. and <. in the gaps, which produces | |
| the largest and smallest items respectively in the list c. | |
| J has a full complement of relational verbs, that is | |
| < <: > >: = ~: | |
| standing for less than, less than or equals, greater than, greater than or equals, | |
| equals and not equals respectively. These are verbs which give Boolean results | |
| representing truth by 1 and falsity by 0. As with arithmetic verbs, corresponding | |
| items in lists of the same length are processed in parallel : | |
| c<d | |
| 1 0 0 0 1 | |
| Frequently an expression like the above is used as an intermediate step in a further | |
| operation such as a copy where 1 means “copy the item” and 0 means “don’t copy” : | |
| (c<d)#c | |
| 3 _2 | |
| (c>:d)#c | |
| 1 4 0.5 | |
| Another verb which returns Boolean (that is 0 or 1) values is the membership verb e.: | |
| 6 e. c | |
| 0 | |
| 9 | |
| Read this as a question “is 6 in c?” If the left argument is a list, the question is asked | |
| for each item individually : | |
| c e. b | |
| 0 0 1 0 0 | |
| c e. d | |
| 1 0 1 0 0 | |
| NB. c is 3 1 4 0.5 _2, b is 4 | |
| NB. recall d is 4 0 3 _1.2 7 | |
| The set of “logical” verbs also give Boolean results. They are | |
| *. +. -. “*: +: | |
| which represent and, or, not, not-and and not-or respectively. For example : | |
| 0 1 1 *.1 1 0 | |
| 0 1 0 | |
| -.c<d | |
| 0 1 1 1 0 | |
| +./0 1 0 1 0 | |
| 1 | |
| The symbol i. called index generator, produces a list of integers starting from 0: | |
| i.6 | |
| 0 1 2 3 4 5 | |
| If the integer argument is negative the result is a list in descending order : | |
| i._6 | |
| 5 4 3 2 1 0 | |
| An important special case arises if the argument is 0, when an empty list is generated : | |
| i.0 | |
| NB. list with zero items | |
| #i.0 | |
| 0 | |
| $i.0 | |
| 0 | |
| $b | |
| #b | |
| 1 | |
| NB. tally of empty list is scalar zero | |
| NB. shape is a one-item list, viz. zero | |
| NB. shape of a scalar is an empty list | |
| NB. .. but its tally is 1 | |
| Mathematically inclined readers should also note the following : | |
| +/i.0 | |
| 0 | |
| */i.0 | |
| 1 | |
| 10 | |
| These are the “identity values” of the verbs to the left of /, that is, those values id | |
| for which x verb id is equal to x for all values of x. Recall that comma means | |
| append, so +/c,x and (+/c)++/x must be equal, since the sum of the list c,x is | |
| equal to the sum of the sums of its parts. If x is i.0 then +/c,x is just +/c and | |
| so +/i.0 must be the identity value for + . A similar argument applies to * . | |
| Grids and Tables | |
| It is easy to generalise i. in order to make a list of any equally spaced values, as you | |
| might want to do in marking points on the axis of a graph. For example, the integers | |
| from –4 to +4 are given by | |
| _4+i.9 | |
| _4 _3 _2 _1 0 1 2 3 4 | |
| and those from 3 to 9 at intervals of one half by | |
| 3+0.5*i.13 | |
| 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9 | |
| The 256 ASCII characters are collected together in a constant noun a. called | |
| alphabet, in which the upper case letters of the usual alphabet commence at the item | |
| indexed as 65 and the lower case ones at 97. Hence the lower case alphabetic | |
| characters are | |
| (97+i.26){a. | |
| abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz | |
| The dyadic form of / gives verb tables, for example the ordinary addition and | |
| multiplication tables for the first five natural numbers are, written side by side | |
| k=.1 2 3 4 5 | |
| k+/k | |
| 2 3 4 5 6 | |
| 3 4 5 6 7 | |
| 4 5 6 7 8 | |
| 5 6 7 8 9 | |
| 6 7 8 9 10 | |
| k*/k | |
| 1 2 3 4 5 | |
| 2 4 6 8 10 | |
| 3 6 9 12 15 | |
| 4 8 12 16 20 | |
| 5 10 15 20 25 | |
| Tables can be used as indices and so all of the ideas in this subsection can be put | |
| together in the phrase : | |
| (k*/k){(96+i.26){a. | |
| abcde | |
| bdfhj | |
| cfilo | |
| dhlpt | |
| ejoty | |
| 11 | |
| i. also has a dyadic form called index of which is somewhat like e. Remembering | |
| that the first item has index 0, compare : | |
| c | |
| 3 1 4 0.5 _2 | |
| c e.b | |
| 0 0 1 0 0 | |
| c i.b | |
| 2 | |
| NB. is c a member of b(= 4)? | |
| NB. what is the index of b in c? | |
| If both arguments are lists | |
| d | |
| 4 0 3 _1.2 7 | |
| d i.c | |
| 2 5 0 5 5 | |
| NB. reminder! | |
| NB. what are the d-indices of c? | |
| the three fives (one more than the largest index in c) indicate that the second, fourth | |
| and fifth items in c do not occur in d. | |
| The verbs take {. and drop }. do just this to a specified number of items from a | |
| list – from the left of the list if the left argument is positive, and from the right if it is | |
| negative : | |
| 3{.c | |
| 3 1 4 | |
| _3{.c | |
| 4 0.5 _2 | |
| 3}.c | |
| 0.5 _2 | |
| _3}.c | |
| 3 1 | |
| Used monadically, the default left argument is 1. In addition, the verb tail {: | |
| selects the last item in a list : | |
| {:c | |
| _2 | |
| Take has the further property that “over-taking” is permitted, that is fill items (0 for | |
| numeric data, and blank for character) are used to pad out when necessary : | |
| 7{.c | |
| 3 1 4 0.5 _2 0 0 | |
| _25{.'J is useful' | |
| J is useful | |
| 12 | |
| SECTION 2 : INTRODUCING SIMULATION | |
| You have now seen that using J is in many ways more like handling a very | |
| sophisticated calculator than a computer. Used in this way, it is a remarkable tool for | |
| solving routine problems in many disciplines. The techniques in this section show | |
| some ways in which you can take advantage of its capability for taking samples. | |
| Classifying, tabulating and condensing actual or simulated data are all easy in J. | |
| Problems involving rolling dice and tossing coins are simple enough to observe what | |
| actually happens as well as to predict what you would theoretically expect to happen. | |
| The symbol ? is called roll as in “roll a die”, so that ?6 models rolling a die with six | |
| faces, or more generally randomly selecting one of the first six non-negative integers : | |
| ?6 | |
| 0 | |
| ?6 | |
| 4 | |
| NB. first throw | |
| NB. second throw | |
| The faces are usually numbered from 1 to 6. Conveniently, the verb increment >: | |
| adds 1 to each item(Likewise decrement <: subtracts 1 from each item) : | |
| NB. b is one greater than a | |
| b=.>:a=.?6 | |
| a | |
| 4 | |
| b | |
| 5 | |
| Suppose we had ten dice. J extends roll to a list of integers so that the computer | |
| simulates the throws of ten dice, or equivalently ten throws of a single die : | |
| >:?6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 | |
| 4 2 1 5 5 6 3 4 5 1 | |
| Suppose that we now simulate a multiple choice test in which there are ten questions | |
| each with five options : | |
| +t=.?10#5 | |
| 3 4 4 4 1 2 2 0 2 2 | |
| To convert these into, say, letters of the alphabet use from : | |
| t{'abcde' | |
| deeebccacc | |
| In a similar way simulate the tossing of six coins where 0 represents a tail and 1 a | |
| head. First make six copies of the integer 2 : | |
| 6#2 | |
| 2 2 2 2 2 2 | |
| 13 | |
| and then roll (that is) toss each of them : | |
| (?6#2){'th' | |
| hhthth | |
| Often what is interesting is aggregates rather than the individual rolls. For example | |
| you might want to simulate several times the gender distribution of 1000 births in a | |
| hospital where 0 represents a girl and 1 a boy : | |
| +/?1000#2 | |
| 501 | |
| +/?1000#2 | |
| 480 | |
| All the above examples have used roll monadically. The dyadic case is called deal , | |
| for which the difference is that the left argument gives the number of draws and also | |
| the values of i.right argument are progressively deleted:, | |
| 6?6 | |
| 4 1 0 3 5 2 | |
| This means that the right argument must be at least as great as the left argument, | |
| otherwise the left argument is outside the domain, that is, the permitted values : | |
| 7?6 | |
| |domain error | |
| | 7 ?6 | |
| There are no limits to the shape of the structure of the units from which the draws are | |
| to be made. For example, suppose the multiple choice test above was taken by each | |
| of five children, so that the simulation is now one of six ten-item lists, each item | |
| within which is a random draw from i.5 : | |
| u=.?6 10$5 | |
| 4 2 3 4 3 4 3 3 0 4 | |
| 2 2 0 3 2 3 3 0 4 4 | |
| 4 2 0 2 4 1 2 1 2 4 | |
| 2 2 4 1 1 4 0 3 3 0 | |
| 0 3 3 1 2 3 3 1 4 3 | |
| 4 0 0 3 3 1 1 0 1 4 | |
| Now make a draw from each of these, and translate into letters as before : | |
| u{'abcde' | |
| ecdededdae | |
| ccadcddaee | |
| ecacebcbce | |
| ccebbeadda | |
| addbcddbed | |
| eaaddbbabe | |
| 14 | |
| A nice application of this technique is to simulate hands of 13 cards from a pack. | |
| First assume that the cards are ordered in the pack from smallest to highest, and in suit | |
| order Diamonds, Clubs, Hearts, Spades. (Whether any actual pack is physically | |
| ordered in this way makes no difference to the quality of the simulation.). A draw is | |
| then a choice of 13 integers from 0 to 51 without replacement : | |
| +hand=.13?52 | |
| 43 50 25 45 40 4 9 11 24 42 17 19 37 | |
| Next calculate the suits by dividing these values by 13 and rounding down (the | |
| monadic is called ravel and causes the value of its argument, in this case suits , to | |
| be displayed as a simple list) : | |
| ,suits=.(<.hand%13){'CDHS' | |
| SSDSSCCCDSDDH | |
| Now calculate the values by taking remainders on division by 13 : | |
| ,values=.(13|hand){'23456789TJQKA' | |
| 6KA836JKK568K | |
| Finally use a verb laminate (,:) to align the cards nicely in columns : | |
| values,:suits | |
| 6KA836JKK568K | |
| SSDSSCCCDSDDH | |
| NB. 6 of spades, King of spades etc. | |
| Simple counts of combinatoric items are obtained by the verbs factorial ! and its | |
| dyadic form out of, which gives the number of combinations of r objects out of n : | |
| NB. factorial 0 thru factorial 5 | |
| NB. e.g.21=no of selections of 2 out of 7 | |
| !i.6 | |
| 1 1 2 6 24 120 | |
| 2!2+i.6 | |
| 1 3 6 10 15 21 | |
| Pascal’s Triangle | |
| The arrangement of integers known as Pascal’s triangle in which the binomial | |
| coefficients appear in columns is constructed using the table : | |
| (i.8)!/i.8 | |
| 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 | |
| 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | |
| 0 0 1 3 6 10 15 21 | |
| 0 0 0 1 4 10 20 35 | |
| 0 0 0 0 1 5 15 35 | |
| 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 21 | |
| 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 | |
| 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 | |
| 15 | |
| SECTION 3 : DEFINING YOUR OWN VERBS | |
| The starting point is again the list | |
| c | |
| 3 1 4 0.5 _2 | |
| In section 1 we saw how the expressions >./ and <./ supplied the maximum and | |
| minimum values respectively, and the range of v is simply the difference between | |
| these two values. J allows us to express this as | |
| >./ - <./ | |
| using a verb structure which is known as a fork : | |
| (>./-<./)c | |
| 6 | |
| Instead of constantly having to use parentheses to write this compound verb, it can be | |
| consolidated by assignment to a user-defined name : | |
| range=.>./-<./ | |
| range c | |
| 6 | |
| One of the most important features of the verb which has just been defined is that, | |
| unlike almost every other programming language you are likely to have encountered, | |
| there is no explicit reference to data (that is, arguments) in the definition. This | |
| particular style of programming is known as tacit programming. | |
| Another example of tacit programming, which also exhibits the fork structure is | |
| mean=.+/%# | |
| mean c | |
| 1.3 | |
| The central operation, divide, is performed on two functions, namely the sum +/ and | |
| x∑ , only | |
| n | |
| the tally # of the data. This is just what in mathematics might be written | |
| as noted above, the J definition makes no reference to data such as x and n. | |
| A composite verb such as +/%# consists of three verbs written one after the other. | |
| When two rather than three verbs are written together the combination is called a | |
| hook. The verbs concerned may be primitive (that is part of the basic J repertoire) or | |
| user-defined, and so a simple example of this structure is -mean . | |
| (-mean)c means c-mean c, that is the single argument is used first as a | |
| monadic argument to the right verb, and then as the left argument of the left verb. In | |
| general, for verbs u and v, the hook (u v)y is equivalent to y u v(y). So define | |
| 16 | |
| mdev=.-mean | |
| mdev c | |
| 1.7 _0.3 2.7 _0.8 _3.3 | |
| NB. deviations from the mean | |
| It is natural to ask what happens if there are four verbs in a row, say u v w x. The | |
| answer is that the three rightmost are resolved as a fork leaving two verbs to form a | |
| hook u (v w x) : | |
| (-+/%#)c | |
| 1.7 _0.3 2.7 _0.8 _3.3 | |
| Similarly five verbs resolve into two forks, and so on. | |
| Those who have experience of writing programs may protest that “real” programs of | |
| any magnitude consist of actions in sequence - do this, then this, then this …, just | |
| like main verbs in stories. However, there is another way in which verbs can be | |
| combined in English, which becomes apparent when you think of verbs such as | |
| ‘stirfry’ and ‘sleepwalk’. If you fried the food completely and then stirred it, there is | |
| no way in which you could be said to have ‘stirfried’ it! Rather the two verbs ‘stir’ | |
| and ‘fry’ are blended together or fused in a manner which says that the primary verb | |
| ‘fry’ is elaborated with an action ‘stir’ which must take place concurrently with it. | |
| Similarly with ‘sleepwalk’, the primary action is walking, only it is a new kind of | |
| walking, which happens when sleeping and walking take place simultaneously. Yet | |
| another example which emphasises concurrency even more directly is the verb | |
| ‘timestamp’. Were the event to be timed after the stamping, the two activities of | |
| timing and stamping would not take place in exact synchronisation, and similarly if | |
| the stamping were to take place after the timing. | |
| A generic feature which all these compound verbs have in common is that of ‘joining’ | |
| simple verbs, which leads, by analogy with usage in English grammar, to the use of | |
| the term conjunction. Further there is a generic property involved in the type of | |
| concurrent fusion which is implicit in all three compound verbs described above; this | |
| idea is consolidated in the specific conjunction @ which is called atop. Thus, in a | |
| pidgin mixture of English and J : | |
| stirfry =. stir @ fry, sleepwalk =. sleep @ walk, timestamp =. time @ stamp | |
| Contrast this with the kind of sequencing which takes place in a childlike narrative : | |
| “We got dressed, then we ate breakfast, then we cleaned our teeth, then we walked to | |
| the woods, then we picnicked ….” | |
| where one thing happens strictly after another in sequence. Another J conjunction | |
| called at @: deals with this method of joining verbs, so that, using the pidgin mixture | |
| above, and taking account of the fact that “after” in English requires a verb reversal | |
| compared with “then”, the above story could be related : | |
| “We picnicked @: walked @: cleaned teeth @: ate @: got dressed” | |
| 17 | |
| Reflection on ordinary linguistic experience thus shows that in combining verbs there | |
| is an implicit distinction between fusion with concurrency on the one hand, and strict | |
| sequencing on the other. Because J is of necessity a precise language you are required | |
| to distinguish explicitly between these two cases when you choose to combine verbs, | |
| which, as we have already seen, is an inevitable activity in writing your own | |
| programs. Thus we look next at how the two J conjunctions , @ and @: are used in | |
| programming practice. First, here is a new verb square whose symbol is *: | |
| *:c | |
| 9 1 16 0.25 4 | |
| Suppose that we wish to total these squared values. The composite operation “total- | |
| atop-square” which is a fusion of total and square means that the combined verb is | |
| applied to every item in the argument list. Since “total” can be perfectly reasonably | |
| applied to a single number x, that is +/x is just x, the effect of “total-atop-square” is | |
| no different from square by itself : | |
| (+/@*:)c | |
| 9 1 16 0.25 4 | |
| NB. total atop square for each item | |
| The other interpretation, and in practice the more likely one, is that “square” should | |
| produce an intermediate result before “total” is applied, that is, as in the children’s | |
| narrative, we seek “total-after-square” . In this case @: must be used : | |
| (+/@:*:)c | |
| 30.25 | |
| NB. total after square for entire list | |
| If you like, you can think of @: as providing a weaker linkage between the verbs | |
| than @ does . In order to sum the squares of deviations from the mean, say | |
| (+/@(*:@mdev))c | |
| 21.8 | |
| which provides the definition of a “sum of squares” verb : | |
| ssq=.+/@(*: @mdev) | |
| ssq c | |
| 21.8 | |
| Conjunctions are always resolved at the earliest possible point on a left to right | |
| reading scan, so that if the parentheses were to omitted in the above definition, the | |
| meaning would be (+/@(*:)@mdev which, as described above, results in totalling | |
| being applied to individual items : | |
| ssq1=.+/@*: @mdev | |
| ssq1 c | |
| 2.89 0.09 7.29 0.64 10.89 | |
| Following the discussion of grids in section 1, here is how a monadic verb grid | |
| might be developed, given its argument is to be a three-item list consisting of start | |
| 18 | |
| point, interval width, number of items. First use the hook (*i.)to construct the | |
| intervals, then convert this to a fork using take and drop in order to make ti | |
| monadic : | |
| 2(*i.)5 | |
| 0 2 4 6 8 | |
| ti=.{.(*i.)}. | |
| ti 2 5 | |
| 0 2 4 6 8 | |
| NB. 2 times 0 1 2 3 4 | |
| NB. ti=times index generator | |
| Apply this technique a second time to introduce the location parameter, and recognise | |
| also the fact that ti must be applied after the scale and size parameters have been | |
| extracted by drop : | |
| grid=.{.+ti@}. | |
| grid 97 2 5 | |
| 97 99 101 103 105 | |
| It may have struck you in comparing J verb definitions with conventional program | |
| writing, that although argument data is excluded from the former, some programs | |
| necessarily involve constants. For example, to write a verb to round numbers to a | |
| given number of decimal places, use of the number 10 is unavoidable. A possible | |
| starting point is a hook which multiplies x (left argument) by “10 to the power..” J | |
| allows you to “bind” the constant 10 to the power verb with a conjunction bond & . | |
| up=.*10&^ | |
| 3.757 4.232 up 2 | |
| 375.7 423.2 | |
| NB. x times 10 to the power y | |
| Simple rounding, that is to the nearest integer, consists of adding 0.5 to a number and | |
| taking its floor. This calls for another bond to define a verb rnd for simple rounding : | |
| rnd=.<.@(0.5&+) | |
| rnd 3.4 | |
| 3 | |
| NB. add a half and round down | |
| and the next step is to combine rounding with “upping” in an “after” relationship : | |
| 3.757 4.232(rnd@up)2 | |
| 376 423 | |
| By analogy with up define | |
| down=.%10&^ | |
| NB. x divided by 10 to the y | |
| so that the desired result is | |
| (3.757 4.232(rnd@up)2)down 2 | |
| 3.76 4.23 | |
| 19 | |
| Notice that the parameter 2 is used as a right argument twice in the above expression. | |
| To permit this reuse J has two verbs left and right written as [ and ] respectively which | |
| extract the right and left arguments. Using these, the operations embedded in the | |
| above line are brought together in the form of a fork : | |
| round=.rnd@up down ] | |
| 3.757 4.232 round 2 | |
| 3.76 4.23 | |
| Explicit programming | |
| When you start to write programs which are appreciably larger than those of the | |
| preceding subsection, joining verbs correctly can begin to make demands on mental | |
| ingenuity. Accordingly, a more conventional style of defining programs is allowed | |
| which allows left and right argument data to be referred explicitly as x. and y. | |
| respectively. Redefining ssq in this style should make things clear : | |
| ssq=.monad define | |
| +/ *: mdev y. | |
| ) | |
| ssq i.5 | |
| 10 | |
| ssq c | |
| 21.8 | |
| Notice that mdev is still defined tacitly showing that the programmer is free to mix | |
| explicit and tacit styles in whatever way he or she find most comfortable. In the case | |
| of round we have a dyadic verb : | |
| round=.dyad define | |
| (rnd x. up y.)down y. | |
| ) | |
| 3.757 4.232 round 2 | |
| 3.76 4.23 | |
| In this case explicit programming avoids the need to use the conjunction @ which | |
| was necessary in the earlier tacit definition. If you find conjunctions are tricky to | |
| master, then the ability to switch between explicit and tacit styles can be invaluable. | |
| J even provides the capability to “translate” an explicit verb automatically into a tacit | |
| one as in the following dialogue : | |
| 9!:3(5) | |
| NB. set system for linear display of verbs | |
| 13 : '(rnd x. up y.)down y.' | |
| ([: rnd up) down ] | |
| 9!:3 is a foreign conjunction like 9!:11 which was used earlier to set the print | |
| precision. The available parameters are 2, 4 and 5, which instructs the system to set | |
| verb display to boxed, tree and linear formats respectively. | |
| 20 | |
| 13 : is a code which requests the translation of whatever explicit definition string | |
| follows in quotes. The result includes a new symbol cap [: which is necessary | |
| because the translator resolves everything in terms of forks.. When a monadic | |
| function like rnd is encountered, a dummy symbol is necessary to fill the place of the | |
| left tine of the fork. | |
| Verbs for sorting | |
| J contains two primitive verbs for sorting, namely grade up /: and grade down \:. | |
| These return the permutations which would cause the list given as right argument to | |
| be sorted in ascending (descending) order : | |
| /:c | |
| 4 3 1 0 2 | |
| 4 3 0 1 2{c | |
| _2 0.5 3 1 4 | |
| \:c | |
| 2 0 1 3 4 | |
| 2 0 1 3 4{c | |
| 4 3 1 0.5 _2 | |
| NB. upward sorting permutation | |
| NB. c sorted upwards | |
| NB. downward sorting permutation | |
| NB. c sorted downwards | |
| Each of these pairs of steps can be reduced to a hook. But first observe that the | |
| arguments of any dyadic verb can be switched from left to right by applying an adverb | |
| reflex, so that the immediately preceding result could also have been achieved using | |
| the verb {~ : | |
| c{~2 0 1 3 4 | |
| 4 3 1 0.5 _2 | |
| NB. c sorted downwards | |
| Recall that a hook is a composite verb defined by writing two verbs one after the other | |
| so that (u v)y is equivalent to y u v(y). Thus combining the verbs {~ and /: gives | |
| ({~/:)c | |
| _2 0.5 1 3 4 | |
| NB. c sorted upwards | |
| leading to user-defined verbs | |
| sortu=.{~/: NB. sort upwards | |
| sortu c | |
| _2 0.5 1 3 4 | |
| and | |
| sortd=.{~\: NB. sort downwards | |
| sortd c | |
| 4 3 1 0.5 _2 | |
| 21 | |
| A further primitive verb nub removes duplicates from a list : | |
| ~. 4 6 2 4 4 6 2 5 4 | |
| 4 6 2 5 | |
| so that an upwardly sorted list with duplicates removed is given by sortu atop | |
| nub. As you have already seen atop is expressed by the conjunction @ | |
| (sortu@~.)4 6 2 4 4 6 2 5 4 | |
| 2 4 5 6 | |
| This can be made into another user defined verb : | |
| unub=.sortu @ ~. NB. upwardly sorted nub | |
| unub 4 6 2 4 4 6 2 5 4 | |
| 2 4 5 6 | |
| A verb for reversing and shifting | |
| The verb |. in its monadic reverses a list, and in its dyadic form performs a shift, to | |
| the left if the left argument is positive, and to the right if it is negative : | |
| |.c | |
| _2 0.5 4 1 3 | |
| |.'J is useful.' | |
| .lufesu si J | |
| 2|.1 2 3 4 5 | |
| 3 4 5 1 2 | |
| _1|.1 2 3 4 5 | |
| 5 1 2 3 4 | |
| NB. reverse c | |
| NB. shift >:i.5 two places to left | |
| NB. shift >:i.5 one place to right | |
| The principle remains the same even if the argument is a list of lists : | |
| ]m=.3 5$'rosessmellsweet' NB. list of three words | |
| roses | |
| smell | |
| sweet | |
| 1 |.m | |
| smell | |
| sweet | |
| roses | |
| NB. shift words one place up | |
| Suppose that a verb is wanted which removes duplicate blanks from sentences. A first | |
| step is to compare the sentence as a character list with itself shifted one place right, | |
| and marking where matching items are not equal : | |
| test=.~:~1&|. | |
| test s=.'how are you today ?' | |
| 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 | |
| 22 | |
| Then use copy to retain only the marked items : | |
| (#~test) s | |
| how are you today ? | |
| A flaw in the above verb is that it will remove duplicates of any character, not just | |
| space. This can be adjusted for by making a fork whose centre verb is or +. and | |
| which does a not equal ~: comparison with space : | |
| s1=.'marry me, harry !' | |
| (#~test+.~:&' ') s1 | |
| marry me, harry ! | |
| so the final defined verb for RemoveDuplicateBlanks is rdb=.#~test+.~:&' '. | |
| Conditional structures in J are catered for using a mechanism called a gerund, in | |
| which a succession of verbs are separated by the conjunction tie `, followed by | |
| another conjunction called agenda @., followed by a verb whose result is an integer | |
| index into the tied verb list. The overall structure is what is known in programming as | |
| a case statement. As a simple example applied to an if-then-else situation, consider | |
| how the median of a list of ordered numbers might be programmed. If the tally of the | |
| argument list is odd, then the median is the value of the middle number. If it is even | |
| the median is the mean of the values of the two middle numbers. | |
| A first step is to obtain the index of the median value or values. Define | |
| half=.-:@<: | |
| NB. halve one less than rt. argument | |
| If the argument is odd, the result is a single integer. However, if the argument is even | |
| the result is a fraction n.5 and what is wanted is both the floor and ceiling . The | |
| condition “is-odd” is the result of 2&| whose result must be 0 or 1 which are | |
| appropriate indices for the two case verbs and leads to the following definition : | |
| medind=.((<.,>.)@half) ` half @.(2&|) | |
| medind # 1 3 4 7 | |
| 1 2 | |
| Next apply the index(es) using from and finally use mean defined above : | |
| (mean@:{~medind@#) 1 3 4 7 | |
| 3.5 | |
| As a final step the verb sortu can be incorporated, so that the requirement that the | |
| list be ordered initially can be removed : | |
| median=.(mean@:{~medind@#)@sortu | |
| median 7 4 1 3 | |
| 3.5 | |
| 23 | |
| SECTION 4 : FITTING EQUATIONS TO DATA | |
| One of the most powerful mathematical J primitive verbs is matrix inverse, which also | |
| provides least squares fitting in its dyadic form. As an example, consider the | |
| simultaneous equations | |
| x + 2y –3z = 15 | |
| x + y + z = 12 | |
| 2x – y – z = 0 | |
| The coefficient matrix of the left hand side is : | |
| +m=.3 3$1 2 _3 1 1 1 2 _1 _1 | |
| 1 2 _3 | |
| 1 1 1 | |
| 2 _1 _1 | |
| Its inverse is | |
| %.m | |
| 0 0.3333 0.3333 | |
| 0.2 0.3333 _0.2667 | |
| _0.2 0.3333 _0.06667 | |
| The solution of the equations is : | |
| 15 12 0%.m | |
| 4 7 1 | |
| The functionality of %.does not stop here. Suppose | |
| x,:y | |
| 2.1 2.4 3.6 3.7 4.3 5.1 5.5 5.8 5.9 6.6 7.4 8.2 | |
| 4.1 6.0 5.5 8.2 7.5 12.6 8.1 10.8 7.2 13.1 11.3 15.6 | |
| NB. x and y as laminated lists | |
| are readings from an experiment in which a best-fitting straight line is to be found : | |
| y%.x | |
| 1.786 | |
| says that y = 1.786x is the “best-fitting” line (in the least squares sense) of the form | |
| y = kx. It is usually more useful to fit a constant as well, that is either y = kx + c or | |
| x = ky +c. A variant of append called append items adds 1 to every item in a list : | |
| y%.1,.x | |
| 1.272 1.563 | |
| x%.1,.y | |
| 0.8117 0.4624 | |
| so y = 1.272 + 1.563x and x = 0.812 + 0.462y are the two regression lines. | |
| 24 | |
| The right argument of %.in the first of these two phrases is equivalent to x^/i.2 | |
| since x^0 is 1 for all values of x . Thus : | |
| y %. x^/i.2 | |
| 1.27181 1.56334 | |
| NB. Best fitting straight line | |
| This idea can be immediately extended by using powers 0,1,2 in order to give the | |
| best-fitting quadratic : | |
| y %. x^/i.3 | |
| 2.768 0.8803 0.06781 | |
| NB. Best fitting quadratic | |
| Now suppose data are the values of a polynomial, say the cubic function 0.5x 3 + 4x2 | |
| + 5x – 6. First assign a list of the coefficients in reverse order : | |
| coef=._6 5 4 0.5 | |
| Next supply a set of x values for which you wish to evaluate the polynomial : | |
| +x=._4+i.9 | |
| _5 _4 _3 _2 _1 0 1 2 3 | |
| Now use a verb p.which evaluates the polynomial at all values of x.: | |
| +y=.coef p. x | |
| 38 15 0 _7 _6 3 20 45 78 | |
| An x,y table for the polynomial is : | |
| x,:y | |
| _4 _3 _2 _1 0 1 2 3 4 | |
| 6 1.5 _4 _7.5 _6 3.5 24 58.5 110 | |
| The best fitting straight line and quadratic are | |
| y %. x^/i.2 | |
| 20.667 10.9 | |
| y %. x^/i.3 | |
| _6 10.9 4 | |
| that is y = 10.9x + 20.667 and y = 4x2 + 10.9x – 6, whereas the best fitting cubic | |
| recovers the original coefficient values : | |
| y %. x^/i.4 | |
| _6 5 4 0.5 | |
| 25 | |
| SECTION 5 : BOXES AND RECORDS | |
| The concept of a “box” greatly enhances the variety of data structures that J can | |
| handle. The principle is that any list structure, however complex, can be cast into a | |
| container called a box, which it itself a scalar. The analogy with records in | |
| conventional data processing should be clear, as should the application of the verb | |
| box < in the following example : | |
| fname=.'Harry' | |
| sname=.'Potter' | |
| fpubl=.1998 | |
| shelfcode=.'childrens' | |
| (<fname),(<sname),(<fpubl),<shelfcode | |
| +-----+------+----+---------+ | |
| |Harry|Potter|1998|childrens| | |
| +-----+------+----+---------+ | |
| Without boxing it is not possible to mix character and numeric data : | |
| fname,sname,fpubl | |
| |domain error | |
| | fname,sname ,fpubl | |
| Also, boxes are complex scalar objects which are quite different both in character and | |
| in permissible operations from their contents. For example, if m=.i.3 4 : | |
| (<m),<m | |
| +---------+---------+ | |
| |0 1 2 3|0 1 2 3| | |
| |4 5 6 7|4 5 6 7| | |
| |8 9 10 11|8 9 10 11| | |
| +---------+---------+ | |
| The result is a list of two items in a row, each of which is a container for three lists | |
| each of four items. Adding the contents of the boxed lists works fine : | |
| m+m | |
| 0 2 4 6 | |
| 8 10 12 14 | |
| 16 18 20 22 | |
| but if you try adding the containers there is a problem : | |
| (<m)+<m | |
| |domain error | |
| | (<m) +<m | |
| 26 | |
| This error message says clearly that adding in the numerical sense is not appropriate | |
| for the container domain, and in the same way you may not mix the numeric and | |
| character domains : | |
| fname + fpubl | |
| |domain error | |
| | fname +fpubl | |
| An alternative to boxing items individually to construct a boxed list is to use the verb | |
| link ; : | |
| fname;sname;fpubl;shelfcode | |
| +-----+------+----+---------+ | |
| |Harry|Potter|1998|childrens| | |
| +-----+------+----+---------+ | |
| A matching verb open undoes boxed structures, but naturally requires type | |
| consistency for the unboxed contents : | |
| >fname;sname;shelfcode | |
| Harry | |
| Potter | |
| childrens | |
| that is, the result of the above open is three character lists. | |
| A commercial type data set could be built up with further levels of boxing, for | |
| example : | |
| rec1=.fname;sname;fpubl;shelfcode | |
| rec2=.'Jane';'Eyre';1847;'classics' | |
| (<rec1),:<rec2 | |
| +-----------------------------+ | |
| |+-----+------+----+---------+| | |
| ||Harry|Potter|1998|childrens|| | |
| |+-----+------+----+---------+| | |
| +-----------------------------+ | |
| |+----+----+----+--------+ | | |
| ||Jane|Eyre|1847|classics| | | |
| |+----+----+----+--------+ | | |
| +-----------------------------+ | |
| using laminate ,: to align the records vertically. (n.b.(<rec1),<rec2 would be | |
| a list of two single items, and so, as with say 2 3, the items would be displayed side by | |
| side.) Subsequent additions to the data set are made with simple appends : | |
| rec3=.'Peter';'Rabbit';1904;'childrens' | |
| ds=.(rec1,:rec2),rec3 | |
| 27 | |
| ds | |
| +-----+------+----+---------+ | |
| |Harry|Potter|1998|childrens| | |
| +-----+------+----+---------+ | |
| |Jane |Eyre |1847|classics | | |
| +-----+------+----+---------+ | |
| |Peter|Pan |1904|childrens| | |
| +-----+------+----+---------+ | |
| This is a list of three four-item lists, and so | |
| #(rec1,:rec2),rec3 | |
| 3 | |
| $(rec1,:rec2),rec3 | |
| 3 4 | |
| To extract a list of shelfcodes, use transpose and then from : | |
| scs=.3{|:ds | |
| scs | |
| +---------+--------+---------+ | |
| |childrens|classics|childrens| | |
| +---------+--------+---------+ | |
| This list can now be used to select the rows which correspond to children’s books : | |
| (scs=<'childrens')#ds | |
| +-----+------+----+---------+ | |
| |Harry|Potter|1998|childrens| | |
| +-----+------+----+---------+ | |
| |Peter|Pan |1904|childrens| | |
| +-----+------+----+---------+ | |
| To sort the records in alphabetical order of surnames use 1 to extract the snames | |
| fields, then grade-up (introduced in section 3) to find the required permutation : | |
| /:1{|:ds | |
| 1 0 2 | |
| Then apply this to make the required selection from the list of records : | |
| (/:1{|:ds){ds | |
| +-----+------+----+---------+ | |
| |Jane |Eyre |1847|classics | | |
| +-----+------+----+---------+ | |
| |Peter|Pan |1904|childrens| | |
| +-----+------+----+---------+ | |
| |Harry|Potter|1998|childrens| | |
| +-----+------+----+---------+ | |
| 28 | |
| SECTION 6 : INVESTIGATING POSSIBILITIES | |
| This section begins with a problem. Suppose we have a situation with four two-way | |
| choices, for each of which something must be accepted or rejected. These could be to | |
| add (or not add) onions, cheese, sausage or mushrooms to a pizza. The aim is to make | |
| a table for the cost for each of the possible selections. | |
| First two relevant verbs base #. and antibase #:. are introduced which allow | |
| numbers to be represented in all manner of different units. For example, converting | |
| 4 hrs. 22 mins. 54 secs. to seconds, and then 2 yds. 2 feet 9 inches to inches is | |
| achieved by : | |
| 0 60 60 #. 4 22 54 NB. base for mins., secs.,is 60 60 | |
| 15774 | |
| 0 3 12 #. 2 2 9 NB. base for ft., ins., is 3 12 | |
| 105 | |
| To convert back to the original units use #: : | |
| 0 60 60 #:15774 NB. secs to hrs. mins. secs. | |
| 4 22 54 | |
| 0 3 12 #:105 | |
| 2 2 9 | |
| NB. inches to yds. ft. ins. | |
| As another example, antibase generates the individual digits in a decimal integer : | |
| 10 10 10 #:658 NB. digits in base 10 | |
| 6 5 8 | |
| When the right argument is a list, the result is a list of lists : | |
| 10 10 10 10 10#:4342 8958 4646 243 10 12334 | |
| 0 4 3 4 2 | |
| 0 8 9 5 8 | |
| 0 4 6 4 6 | |
| 0 0 2 4 3 | |
| 0 0 0 1 0 | |
| 1 2 3 3 4 | |
| With no left argument the default number base is 2, which delivers binary numbers : | |
| NB. 8=*/2 2 2, so it is also #:i.*/2 2 2 | |
| #:i.8 | |
| 0 0 0 | |
| 0 0 1 | |
| 0 1 0 | |
| 0 1 1 | |
| 1 0 0 | |
| 1 0 1 | |
| 1 1 0 | |
| 1 1 1 | |
| 29 | |
| For the purposes of display, it is often convenient to use a verb transpose |: which | |
| reorganises a list of lists into a new set of lists in which the first list is a list of all first | |
| items, the second list is a list of all second items and so on : | |
| |:#:i.8 | |
| 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 | |
| 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 | |
| 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 | |
| Thus, returning to the pizza problem, given 0 means absent and 1 means present | |
| |:#:i.16 | |
| 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 | |
| 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 | |
| 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 | |
| 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 | |
| represents all the possible choices of toppings. | |
| There is no requirement that all the items in the left argument of dyadic #: are the | |
| same. If we wished to allow three possibilities for the second row, say because two | |
| types of cheese become available making a total of 24 possible pizzas in total, we can | |
| supply 2 3 2 2 as the left argument : | |
| |:2 3 2 2#:i.24 | |
| 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 | |
| 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 | |
| 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 | |
| 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 | |
| Now the 24 is just the product of 2 3 2 and 2, or in J terminology */2 3 2 2, and | |
| so there is some redundancy in the above expression. J allows us to avoid this by | |
| using a hook with #: as the left verb, and i.@(*/) as the right verb : | |
| poss=.#:i.@(*/) | |
| |: poss 2 3 2 2 | |
| 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 | |
| 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 | |
| 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 | |
| 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 | |
| Now make and display a list of the ingredients, using open and link described in | |
| section 5 : | |
| ]tops=.>'onions';'cheese';'sausage';'mushrooms ' | |
| onions | |
| cheese | |
| sausage | |
| mushrooms | |
| 30 | |
| The leftmost verb right ], by virtue of its definition, causes a display of everything to | |
| its right. Earlier monadic + and , were used for this purpose; in practice right is much | |
| the commonest way of doing simultaneous assignment and display because it is | |
| independent of type (character or numeric). Now define | |
| tab=.|:poss 2 3 2 2 | |
| tops,tab | |
| |domain error | |
| | tops ,tab | |
| The problem here is that J does not allow mixed types (character and numeric) to be | |
| appended. However, J does provide a very convenient verb format ": which | |
| transforms any numeric object into its character equivalent which looks identical on | |
| display : | |
| tops,":tab | |
| onions | |
| cheese | |
| sausage | |
| mushrooms | |
| 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 | |
| 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 | |
| 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 | |
| 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 | |
| Not quite what we were thinking of - what is needed is append items ,. which was | |
| first met in section 4, and is now used to append the two lists on an item by item basis | |
| as opposed to one list after the other. At the same time we have incorporated the | |
| dyadic form of format which allows a field size to be specified, in this case 1 : | |
| tops,.1 ":tab | |
| onions 000000000000111111111111 | |
| cheese 000011112222000011112222 | |
| sausage 001100110011001100110011 | |
| mushrooms 010101010101010101010101 | |
| Now suppose that we want to compute the costs of the various types of pizza, given | |
| the costs of the various toppings : | |
| cost=.0.80 1.80 2.20 1.50 | |
| The required calculation is to multiply each of the four lists (rows) in tab by the | |
| matching element in cost and then add “down the columns”, that is a +/ applied to | |
| each column. This combination of addition and multiplication, sometimes known as | |
| an “inner product” is expressed by the dot conjunction, and so | |
| cost +/ .* tab | |
| 0 1.5 2.2 3.7 1.8 3.3 4 5.5 3.6 5.1 5.8 7.3 0.8 2.3 3 4.5 | |
| 2.6 4.1 4.8 6.3 4.4 5.9 6.6 8.1 | |
| 31 | |
| gives a list of the 24 possible pizzas. | |
| To display the combinations in the form of a price list use format once again, only | |
| now applying it dyadically to specify a field width of 1 with no decimals for the first | |
| four columns, and 6 with 2 decimal places for the price column : | |
| ((4#1j0),6j2)":|:tab,cost +/ .* tab | |
| 0000 0.00 | |
| 0001 1.50 | |
| 0010 2.20 | |
| 0011 3.70 | |
| 0100 1.80 | |
| 0101 3.30 | |
| 0110 4.00 | |
| 0111 5.50 | |
| …………….. .. | |
| … | |
| and so on. The leftmost column is not very informative, so use copy to make it more | |
| meaningful, having first used append items monadically to change it from a list of 24 | |
| items to a list of 24 single-item lists : | |
| $prices=.cost+/ .*tab | |
| 24 | |
| $,.prices | |
| 24 1 | |
| ((|:tab)#'OCSM'),.6j2":,.prices | |
| 0.00 | |
| M 1.50 | |
| S 2.20 | |
| SM 3.70 | |
| C 1.80 | |
| CM 3.30 | |
| CS 4.00 | |
| CSM 5.50 | |
| CC 3.60 | |
| CCM 5.10 | |
| CCS 5.80 | |
| CCSM 7.30 | |
| O 0.80 | |
| OM 2.30 | |
| OS 3.00 | |
| OSM 4.50 | |
| OC 2.60 | |
| OCM 4.10 | |
| OCS 4.80 | |
| OCSM 6.30 | |
| OCC 4.40 | |
| OCCM 5.90 | |
| OCCS 6.60 | |
| OCCSM 8.10 | |
| 32 | |
| SECTION 7 : EDITING, SYSTEM FACILITIES and SCRIPTS | |
| Sooner or later you will want to write “programs” which you cannot express on a | |
| single line. While J contains many sophisticated features which make it possible to | |
| express a great deal in a single phrase, it can be comforting to know that a more | |
| conventional style of conditional and looping programming is also available. We look | |
| at three ways in which a user-defined verb for Fibonacci numbers can be constructed. | |
| Fibonacci numbers are sequences which are started with two arbitrary numbers (most | |
| commonly 0 and 1), and thereafter each succeeding number is the sum of the previous | |
| two. Clearly such a series could go on indefinitely, and so for practical purposes one | |
| of the parameters of a Fibonacci verb must provide a stopping condition, for example, | |
| either a total number of numbers is given, or the series may stop after a given value | |
| has been exceeded. | |
| The English of the previous sentence can be rendered in J as _2&{. (take the last | |
| two) and then +/@(_2&{.) (sum the last two). Finally we want to join this to what | |
| we started with, which is the verb structure previously recognised as a hook | |
| ,+/@(_2&{.) . Hence a user-defined verb for a single Fibonacci step is | |
| fib=.,+/@(_2&{.) | |
| fib 2 3 | |
| 2 3 5 | |
| Suppose that the stopping condition is that this step has to be performed a given | |
| number of times, say 10. J provides a conjunction power ^: which allows us to say | |
| just this. Its symbol demonstrates the analogy with the power verb which prescribes | |
| how often a number is to be multiplied by itself. | |
| fib^:10(0 1) | |
| 0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 | |
| We can even write this series all in a single line without any named verb, although the | |
| expression could be criticised as becoming a little bit hard to disentangle : | |
| (,+/@(_2&{.))^:10(0 1) | |
| 0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 | |
| Next, here, side by side, are two alternative ways in which we could have written and | |
| executed this program, the second shows incidentally that J supports recursion : | |
| Fib=.dyad define | |
| r=.y. [ i=.0 | |
| while. i<x. do. | |
| i=.i+1 | |
| r=.r,+/_2{.r | |
| end. | |
| ) | |
| Fib=.dyad define | |
| if.x.>0 do. | |
| r=.(x.-1)Fib y. | |
| r=.r,+/_2{.r | |
| else. r=.y. | |
| end. | |
| ) | |
| 10 Fib 0 1 | |
| 0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 | |
| 33 | |
| In the body of the code x. and y. are used to reference the left and right arguments | |
| as in Section 3. and the control words (while. do. end. if. else.) must | |
| be terminated with dots. The code itself is terminated with a right parenthesis at which | |
| point the session reverts to execution mode, as opposed to object definition mode. | |
| The first code line in the left hand program could have been written as two separate | |
| lines – the left bracket acts as a statement separator, although you might have | |
| recognised it as the verb left whose value is what lies to its left, ignoring any right | |
| argument. Its role as a statement separator is a happy consequence of this definition. | |
| The opening line of the above definition could also have been written Fib=.4 :0, | |
| in which case Fib would be a strictly dyadic verb. Another possibility which allows | |
| both a monadic and a dyadic definition is : | |
| Fib=.3 : 0 | |
| 10 Fib y. | |
| : | |
| r=.y. [ i=.0 | |
| … ….. etc. | |
| The first line states that it is a dyadic verb (that is an object of class 3) which is to be | |
| defined. The 0 means that the subsequent input lines are to made from the keyboard. | |
| The colon on the second line separates the monadic and dyadic definitions, and in the | |
| present case establishes a default left argument of 10. | |
| More System Facilities | |
| You have already seen how the foreign conjunction is used to get and set print | |
| precision. With different integer arguments it has many other uses for bridging the | |
| gap between programs and the underlying operating system. For example, a left | |
| argument of 1 is associated with reading and writing. 1!:1(1) means “read from | |
| the keyboard” : | |
| g=.1!:1(1) | |
| I am now typing a message ... | |
| g | |
| I am now typing a message ... | |
| NB. On the keyboard | |
| NB. From the computer | |
| Thus | |
| ask=.monad define | |
| 1!:1(1) | |
| ) | |
| h=.ask 'what''s the score?' | |
| round about 20 | |
| h | |
| round about 20 | |
| NB. From the keyboard | |
| NB. From the computer | |
| You can ask how many verbs there are presently in the workspace by | |
| 34 | |
| 4!:1(3) | |
| +---+---+---+ | |
| |Fib|ask|fib| | |
| +---+---+---+ | |
| For nouns (that is constants and variables), adverbs and conjunctions replace 3 above | |
| with 0, 1 and 2 respectively. | |
| You can ask the time of day with 6!:0’’(1) , the elapsed time since start of session | |
| in microseconds by 6!:1’’(1),together with much, much more which is fully | |
| documented within the J system help facilities. | |
| Scripts | |
| Naturally you do not want to repeat the typing of input every time you want to use a | |
| sequence of user-defined verbs, so J provides for scripts, which are text files, (usually | |
| with qualifier .ijs although any qualifier except .ijx is acceptable) into which you can | |
| save objects for later use. The extension .ijx is reserved for executable J sessions | |
| which run under the control of software known as the “session manager”. It is this | |
| software which, for example, allows you to run an arrow up the screen and re-execute | |
| a previously submitted line. Assume that you have saved work from executing | |
| sessions into a script files. When you want to reuse the script file you can either | |
| (a) load the file explicitly by load'c:\j406\temp\fib.ijs' | |
| (b) Use File/Open to open the script file, which results in the file appearing in | |
| a new window. Once the script has been opened, use Run/Window or Run/Line | |
| from a drop-down menu; | |
| (c) with the script file open, press Ctl-W which is equivalent to (a). | |
| You will find that there are already many existing scripts in your J system, and by | |
| loading these you are able to take advantage of a great deal of other people’s past | |
| work and experience. An example is the statistics package which consists of three | |
| separate scripts obtainable by Open/System/stats.ijs. This script contains three lines | |
| script_z_ <'system\packages\stats\random.ijs' | |
| script_z_ <'system\packages\stats\statfns.ijs' | |
| script_z_ <'system\packages\stats\statdist.ijs' | |
| Do Run/Line on the second of these and you can now execute all the verbs in the | |
| script, for example median which we laboured to program in section 3 is just one | |
| of several statistics immediately available : | |
| median 6 7 9 0 _2 1 5 7 | |
| 5.5 | |
| 35 | |
| SECTION 8 : DRAWING GRAPHS | |
| One feature of the J package which you are bound to welcome is the ease with which | |
| you can draw graphs. First do the following | |
| load 'plot' | |
| plot c=.3 1 4 0.5 _2 | |
| and you should observe a new window containing a plot of these five values plotted | |
| against i.5 on the x axis. Any one-dimensional sequence can be plotted in this way; | |
| you will find that there are verbs in another script which help you draw, for example, | |
| trig series. To draw y= 2sin(5x) + 3cos(12x) from 0 to 2π: | |
| load 'numeric trig' | |
| x=.steps 0,(o.1),100 | |
| NB. o. means“’ 'pi times' | |
| cos=.2&o. [ sin=.1&o. NB. dyadic o. supplies the | |
| NB. trig ratios sin,cos,etc | |
| plot x;(2*sin 5*x)+3*cos(12*x) | |
| To print this graph and simultaneously save it as a file, create the following verb : | |
| pg=.dyad define | |
| 'res fn'=.x.;y. NB. resolution / filename | |
| require'opengl' | |
| glfile fn | |
| glsavebmp res | |
| printbmp_jzopengl_ fn | |
| ) | |
| Then, with the graph displayed in the plot window, issue the following : | |
| 36 | |
| 500 300 pg 'c:\j406\temp\plot1.bmp' | |
| Graphs can be divided into two categories, those which are essentially algebraic, and | |
| those which are inherently geometrical. One example of each is given. | |
| To start with, the polynomial y = 4x2 + 5x – 16 (parabola) is plotted from –4 to 4 by | |
| x=.steps _4 4 100 | |
| plot x;_16 5 4 p.x | |
| In order to make the graph a little more interesting the second item in the link is | |
| changed into a list of three lists, corresponding to a straight line, a parabola and a | |
| cubic respectively : | |
| plot x;((6 5 p.x),:_16 5 4 p.x),_3 _4 2 1 p.x | |
| The example to illustrate geometric graphs involves one possible parametrisation of | |
| the curves known as epicycloids and hypocycloids. The first line below illustrates | |
| incidentally a technique for making multiple assignments on a single line : | |
| 'r R a b'=.2.6 2.36 _40.1 50 | |
| x=.(0.01*o.2)*i.101 | |
| p=.(r*cos(a*x))+R*cos(b*x) | |
| q=.(r*sin(a*x))+R*sin(b*x) | |
| NB. x from 0 to 2pi | |
| The command to make the plot is | |
| 'labels 0'plot p;q | |
| The left argument of plot is a character string which describes just one of the many | |
| possible drawing options, in this case it says “do not display axis labels”. | |
| 37 | |
| Facilities are also provided which allow the construction of a wide range of drawings. | |
| A selection of the basic drawing tools is given below. The graphics window is | |
| assumed to be 2 units high and 2 units deep with the origin (0,0) at the centre. | |
| load 'graph' | |
| gdopen'' | |
| gdrect _0.4 _0.4 0.8 0.8 NB. x y width height | |
| gdellipse 0.5 _0.5 0.2 0.4 NB. centre, axis lens. | |
| gdpolygon t=.0.1*7 1 _7 1 7 _4 _2 6 _1 _6 7 1 | |
| NB. t is six coordinate pairs in succession | |
| gdshow'' NB. window displayed at this point | |
| The scope for drawing graphics and plots is endless, and ample guidance to all the | |
| facilities can be found in the Graph Utilities Lab which is part of the J system. | |
| 38 | |
| SECTION 9 : RANK | |
| If you have successfully followed the preceding sections, you are now ready to | |
| encounter what is one of the most important concepts in J, namely rank.. In section 1 | |
| an object called matrix was defined which, although it looked like a matrix, was in | |
| fact a list of three four-lists. | |
| matrix | |
| 3 1 4 0.5 | |
| _2 3 1 4 | |
| 0.5 _2 3 1 | |
| The fact that it is a list of three lists is made explicit by tally : | |
| #matrix | |
| 3 | |
| and the fact that each of these three lists is a four-list by shape : | |
| $matrix | |
| 3 4 | |
| Tallying the shape | |
| #$matrix | |
| 2 | |
| indicates that matrix is a list of lists, that is after penetrating two list levels | |
| primitive objects, in this case numbers, are reached. This can be expressed more | |
| concisely by saying that “matrix is an object of rank 2”, and leads to the definition | |
| of a verb | |
| rank=.#@$ | |
| It is very important to get the order of verbs right in rank since $@# means tally | |
| first which always results in a scalar, whose shape is an empty list. An alternative and | |
| equivalent definition of rank uses cap which was encountered earlier in section 3 : | |
| rank=.[:#$ | |
| The structure involved here is called a capped fork, although a capped hook might be | |
| a more appropriate name because the effect is to make the verb pair u v return u v(y) | |
| rather than y u v(y) which it would do under the hook rule. In either case : | |
| rank matrix | |
| 2 | |
| rank c=.3 1 4 0.5 _2 | |
| 1 | |
| rank 7 | |
| 0 | |
| 39 | |
| What makes rank a particularly important concept is that verbs, both user-defined and | |
| primitive, can be made to operate at different rank levels. For example we have seen | |
| how box < can make any object into a scalar. Thus : | |
| rank <matrix | |
| 0 | |
| However, if box operates at rank 1, that is 1 level in, then it is only the lowest level | |
| rank 1 objects which are boxed : | |
| <"1 matrix | |
| +---------+--------+----------+ | |
| |3 1 4 0.5|_2 3 1 4|0.5 _2 3 1| | |
| +---------+--------+----------+ | |
| rank <"1 matrix | |
| 1 | |
| Because it joins a verb and a noun, the symbol " is a conjunction, and because of | |
| what it does it is called the rank conjunction. When we come to insert verbs like +/ | |
| rank becomes important and useful in enabling different types of subtotalling to be | |
| performed. To “add-insert” two lists without any reference to rank, means, in a | |
| reasonably obvious sense, add their corresponding items : | |
| +/matrix | |
| 1.5 2 8 5.5 | |
| that is, in matrix terms, add “down the columns”. To “add-insert” at rank 1 means to | |
| add at the lowest list level, that is to add the items in each of the boxes above : | |
| +/"1 m | |
| 8.5 6 2.5 | |
| in matrix terms, this is adding “along the rows” : | |
| To find the grand total of all the items in matrix we have two options using atop : | |
| gt1=.+/@”(+/) or gt2=.+/@, | |
| gt1 matrix | |
| 17 | |
| gt2 matrix | |
| 17 | |
| NB. sum atop ravel | |
| and two using cap : | |
| gt3=.[:+/+/ | |
| gt3 matrix | |
| 17 | |
| gt4=.[:+/, NB. sum after ravel | |
| gt4 matrix | |
| 17 | |
| Which verb you choose is entirely a matter of personal taste. If using the atop form, | |
| notice that parentheses are essential in the definition of gt1 . Without them +/@+/ | |
| 40 | |
| means “insert the verb +/@”+”” which, following the discussion in section 3, is just | |
| the same as inserting the verb + between each of the three top level lists, which in | |
| turn, as we saw above, is the same as adding down the columns : | |
| (+/@+)/ matrix | |
| 1.5 2 8 5.5 | |
| To attach column totals to a matrix use a hook : | |
| ct=.,+/ | |
| ct matrix | |
| 3 1 4 0.5 | |
| _2 3 1 4 | |
| 0.5 _2 3 1 | |
| 1.5 2 8 5.5 | |
| and to attach both row and column totals : | |
| ct ct"1 matrix | |
| 3 1 4 0.5 8.5 | |
| _2 3 1 4 6 | |
| 0.5 _2 3 1 2.5 | |
| 1.5 2 8 5.5 17 | |
| To make this into a user-defined verb there are, as with gt , two options, you may | |
| use either a conjunction with parentheses or cap : | |
| totals1=.ct@:(ct"1) | |
| totals1 m | |
| 3 1 4 0.5 8.5 | |
| _2 3 1 4 6 | |
| 0.5 _2 3 1 2.5 | |
| 1.5 2 8 5.5 17 | |
| or totals2=.[:ct ct"1 | |
| totals2 m | |
| 3 1 4 0.5 8.5 | |
| _2 3 1 4 6 | |
| 0.5 _2 3 1 2.5 | |
| 1.5 2 8 5.5 17 | |
| In totals1 note again the importance of both the parentheses and the need for at | |
| @: as opposed to atop @ . at is vital in this case since the grand total is itself the | |
| sum of totals, namely the row totals, and so it is necessary that column totalling does | |
| not commence until the row totalling and appending is complete, a form of | |
| sequencing which is implicit in cap. | |
| Another example of a verb operating at different rank levels is taken from section 3 | |
| and involves the verb reverse : | |
| m=.3 5$'rosessmellsweet' | |
| w | |
| roses | |
| smell | |
| sweet | |
| 41 | |
| |."1 w | |
| sesor | |
| llems | |
| teews | |
| |.w | |
| sweet | |
| smell | |
| roses | |
| Similarly | |
| sortu m | |
| _2 3 1 4 | |
| 0.5 _2 3 1 | |
| 3 1 4 0.5 | |
| sorts the rows in ascending order of the size of the first item, whereas | |
| sortu"1 m | |
| 0.5 1 3 4 | |
| _2 1 3 4 | |
| _2 0.5 1 3 | |
| sorts each rows into ascending order individually. | |
| Here are the effects of rank with a deeper (that is, rank 3) list : | |
| i.2 2 3 | |
| 0 1 2 | |
| 3 4 5 | |
| 6 7 8 | |
| 9 10 11 | |
| +/"1 i.2 2 3 | |
| 3 12 | |
| 21 30 | |
| +/"2 i.2 2 3 | |
| 3 5 7 | |
| 15 17 19 | |
| i.2 2 3 is a two-list, each item of which is a two-list of three lists. Summing at | |
| rank 1, the result is the sums of each of the inner two-lists of which there are four | |
| altogether. Summing at rank 2, the result is the sums of each of the two pairs of three- | |
| lists. Without the rank conjunction the result is the sum of the two outer two-lists | |
| item by item, exactly as with matrix : | |
| +/i.2 2 3 | |
| 6 8 10 | |
| 12 14 16 | |
| Armed with the rank conjunction the potential of J for expressing data manipulations | |
| is truly formidable. | |
| Here the present investigation of J must cease. As hinted in the introduction there is | |
| much, much more left for you to discover. If you have found what you have met so | |
| far has stimulated you, then you will now proceed at a very fast rate under your own | |
| direction. | |
| 42 | |
| Index | |
| Absolute value, 8 | |
| Adverb, 9, 21, 35 | |
| Agenda, 23 | |
| Alphabet, 11 | |
| Alternating sum, 9 | |
| Anti-base, 29 | |
| Append, 7, 27, 29, 41 | |
| Append items, 24, 31 | |
| Arguments, 6 | |
| Arithmetic functions, 2 | |
| ASCII characters, 11 | |
| Assignment, 3 | |
| At, 17, 41 | |
| Atop, 17, 40 | |
| Base, 29 | |
| Best fitting | |
| polynomials, 25 | |
| Bond, 19 | |
| Box, 26, 40 | |
| Cap, 21, 39, 41 | |
| Capped fork, 39 | |
| Cards, 15 | |
| Case statement, 23 | |
| Ceiling, 7, 23 | |
| Character list, 5, 12 | |
| Combinations, 15 | |
| Comments, 4 | |
| Complex numbers, 4 | |
| Concurrency, 17 | |
| Conjunctions, 17, 35 | |
| Control words, 34 | |
| Copy, 6, 9 | |
| Deal, 13 | |
| Decrement, 13 | |
| Dice, 13 | |
| Domain errors, 14, 26, 31 | |
| Dot conjunction, 31 | |
| Drawing, 36 | |
| Drop, 12, 19 | |
| Dyadic, 6 | |
| Empty list, 10 | |
| Epicycloids, 37 | |
| Explicit Programming, | |
| 20 | |
| Factorial, 15 | |
| Fibonacci numbers, 33 | |
| Fill items, 12 | |
| Floor, 7, 23 | |
| Foreign conjunction, | |
| 3, 20, 34 | |
| Fork, 16, 19 | |
| Format, 31 | |
| From, 5, 13, 23 | |
| Gerund, 23 | |
| Grade down, 21 | |
| Grade up, 21, 28 | |
| Graphs, 36 | |
| Grid, 11,18 | |
| Halve, 23 | |
| Hook, 16, 19 | |
| Hypocycloids, 37 | |
| Identity values, 10 | |
| Increment, 13 | |
| Index generator,10, 11, | |
| 29, 41 | |
| Index of, 12 | |
| Inner product, 31 | |
| Insert, 9, 40 | |
| Keyboard input, 34 | |
| Laminate, 15, 24, 27 | |
| Least squares, 24 | |
| Left, 20, 34 | |
| Link, 27 | |
| Lists, 4 | |
| Logarithms, 4 | |
| Logical verbs, 10 | |
| Matrix, 6, 24, 39 | |
| Matrix inversion, 24 | |
| Maximum, 7 | |
| Mean, 16 | |
| Median, 23, 35 | |
| Membership, 9 | |
| Minimum, 7 | |
| Monadic, 6 | |
| Multiple choice, 14 | |
| Negate, 7 | |
| Not equal, 23 | |
| Noun, 11, 33 | |
| Nub, 22 | |
| Open, 27 | |
| Or, 23 | |
| Out of, 15 | |
| Overtaking, 12 | |
| Pascal’s Triangle, 15 | |
| Permutations, 21, 28 | |
| Pi, 36 | |
| Polynomials, 25, 37 | |
| 43 | |
| Power, 2, 33 | |
| Primitives, 16 | |
| Print precision, 3 | |
| Quadratics, 25 | |
| Range, 16 | |
| Rank, 39 | |
| Ravel, 15 | |
| Reciprocal, 7 | |
| Recursion, 33 | |
| Reflex, 21 | |
| Regression lines, 25 | |
| Relational verbs, 9 | |
| Remove blanks, 22 | |
| Reshape, 6 | |
| Residue, 8 | |
| Reverse, 22, 41 | |
| Right, 20, 31 | |
| Roll, 13 | |
| Rounding, 19 | |
| Scalars, 3 | |
| Scripts, 35 | |
| Sequential | |
| programming, 17 | |
| Session Manager, 35 | |
| Shape of, 6, 39 | |
| Shift, 22 | |
| Signum, 7 | |
| Sorting, 21, 41 | |
| Simultaneous | |
| equations, 24 | |
| Square Root, 4 | |
| Square, 18 | |
| System facilities, | |
| 3, 20,34 | |
| Tables, 11,15 | |
| Tacit programming, 16 | |
| Tail, 12 | |
| Take, 12 | |
| Tally, 5, 39 | |
| Tie, 23 | |
| Time, 35 | |
| Tossing coins, 13 | |
| Transpose, 30 | |
| Trigonometry, 36 | |
| Underbar, 3 | |
| Vectors, 4 | |
| Verbs, 2 | |
| Workspace, 3 | |
| Wrap around, 6 | |
| Vocabulary | |
| The table below gives the J symbols which are used in this booklet. A few other | |
| symbols have also been included there are obvious analogies with those which are | |
| used in the booklet. Where two meanings are given, these are monadic/dyadic. | |
| +. or (dyadic) | |
| -. not (monadic) | |
| *. and (dyadic) | |
| %. matrix inverse (monadic) %: square root | |
| ^. natural logarithm/logarithm | |
| +: double/not-or | |
| -: halve | |
| *: square/not-and | |
| |. reverse/shift | |
| |: transpose | |
| #. base | |
| #: antibase | |
| {. take | |
| ,. append items | |
| <. floor/minimum | |
| >. ceiling/maximum | |
| {: drop | |
| ,: laminate | |
| <: decrement/less than or equal | |
| >: increment/greater than or equal | |
| ~: not equals | |
| [: cap | |
| /: grade-up | |
| \: grade-down | |
| ”": format | |
| e. membership | |
| i. index generator/index of | |
| o. multiply by pi | |
| p. polynomial | |
| Verbs: | |
| + conjugate/plus | |
| - negate/minus | |
| * signum/times | |
| % reciprocal/divide | |
| ^ power | |
| ! factorial/out of | |
| | absolute value/residue | |
| = equals | |
| ? roll/deal | |
| # tally/copy | |
| $ shape of/reshape | |
| { from | |
| , | |
| ravel/append | |
| < box/less than | |
| > open/greater than | |
| ; link | |
| [ left | |
| ] right | |
| Adverbs : | |
| / insert/table | |
| ~ reflex | |
| Conjunctions : | |
| @ atop (strong linkage) @. agenda | |
| & bond | |
| . dot | |
| ` tie | |
| @: after (weak linkage) | |
| ^: power | |
| !: foreign conjunction | |
| Noun : | |
| a. alphabet | |
| Special symbol : | |
| =. assignment | |
| Control words : if. do. else. while. end. | |
| 44 | |