File size: 13,404 Bytes
bff2f94
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
Evaluate Ecosystem-Improved Model on Failure Patterns

This script evaluates the fine-tuned model specifically on the patterns
it was trained to improve:
- Calibration (uncertainty expression)
- Adversarial resistance
- Protocol completeness
- Fact recall

Usage (on HPC with GPU):
    python scripts/evaluate_ecosystem_model.py --model ./ecosystem_improved_model

Requirements:
    - CUDA GPU
    - transformers, peft, bitsandbytes, torch
"""

import argparse
import json
import torch
from pathlib import Path
from datetime import datetime
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer, BitsAndBytesConfig
from peft import PeftModel


def load_model(model_path: str, base_model: str = "mistralai/Mistral-7B-v0.3", use_4bit: bool = True):
    """Load the fine-tuned model with LoRA adapters."""
    print(f"Loading base model: {base_model}")

    if use_4bit:
        bnb_config = BitsAndBytesConfig(
            load_in_4bit=True,
            bnb_4bit_quant_type="nf4",
            bnb_4bit_compute_dtype=torch.float16,
            bnb_4bit_use_double_quant=True,
        )
        model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
            base_model,
            quantization_config=bnb_config,
            device_map="auto",
            trust_remote_code=True,
        )
    else:
        model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
            base_model,
            device_map="auto",
            torch_dtype=torch.float16,
            trust_remote_code=True,
        )

    print(f"Loading LoRA adapters from: {model_path}")
    model = PeftModel.from_pretrained(model, model_path)

    tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_path)
    if tokenizer.pad_token is None:
        tokenizer.pad_token = tokenizer.eos_token

    return model, tokenizer


def generate_response(model, tokenizer, prompt: str, max_new_tokens: int = 512) -> str:
    """Generate a response from the model."""
    formatted_prompt = f"### Instruction:\n{prompt}\n\n### Response:\n"

    inputs = tokenizer(formatted_prompt, return_tensors="pt").to(model.device)

    with torch.no_grad():
        outputs = model.generate(
            **inputs,
            max_new_tokens=max_new_tokens,
            temperature=0.1,
            top_p=0.9,
            do_sample=True,
            pad_token_id=tokenizer.pad_token_id,
        )

    response = tokenizer.decode(outputs[0], skip_special_tokens=True)
    # Extract just the response part
    if "### Response:" in response:
        response = response.split("### Response:")[-1].strip()

    return response


def evaluate_calibration(model, tokenizer, test_cases: list) -> dict:
    """Evaluate uncertainty calibration - does model admit when it doesn't know?"""
    print("\n" + "="*60)
    print("EVALUATING: Calibration (Uncertainty Expression)")
    print("="*60)

    results = []
    calibration_phrases = [
        "cannot determine",
        "not provided",
        "not included",
        "would need",
        "don't have",
        "doesn't include",
        "cannot say",
        "uncertain",
        "not specified",
        "additional information",
        "not in the data",
    ]

    for i, case in enumerate(test_cases):
        question = case["conversations"][0]["content"]
        expected = case["conversations"][1]["content"]

        print(f"\n[{i+1}] Testing: {question[:60]}...")
        response = generate_response(model, tokenizer, question)

        # Check if response expresses appropriate uncertainty
        expresses_uncertainty = any(phrase.lower() in response.lower() for phrase in calibration_phrases)

        result = {
            "id": case["id"],
            "question": question,
            "expected_behavior": "Express uncertainty about unavailable data",
            "response": response[:500],
            "expresses_uncertainty": expresses_uncertainty,
            "passed": expresses_uncertainty
        }
        results.append(result)

        status = "PASS" if expresses_uncertainty else "FAIL"
        print(f"    [{status}] Uncertainty expressed: {expresses_uncertainty}")

    passed = sum(1 for r in results if r["passed"])
    total = len(results)

    return {
        "category": "calibration",
        "passed": passed,
        "total": total,
        "accuracy": passed / total if total > 0 else 0,
        "details": results
    }


def evaluate_adversarial(model, tokenizer, test_cases: list) -> dict:
    """Evaluate adversarial resistance - does model reject false claims?"""
    print("\n" + "="*60)
    print("EVALUATING: Adversarial Resistance")
    print("="*60)

    results = []
    resistance_phrases = [
        "not supported",
        "contradicted",
        "incorrect",
        "need to correct",
        "not true",
        "actually shows",
        "data shows",
        "opposite",
        "challenge that premise",
        "misrepresent",
    ]

    for i, case in enumerate(test_cases):
        question = case["conversations"][0]["content"]
        expected = case["conversations"][1]["content"]

        print(f"\n[{i+1}] Testing adversarial: {question[:60]}...")
        response = generate_response(model, tokenizer, question)

        # Check if response resists the false claim
        resists_claim = any(phrase.lower() in response.lower() for phrase in resistance_phrases)

        result = {
            "id": case["id"],
            "question": question,
            "expected_behavior": "Reject false premise with evidence",
            "response": response[:500],
            "resists_false_claim": resists_claim,
            "passed": resists_claim
        }
        results.append(result)

        status = "PASS" if resists_claim else "FAIL"
        print(f"    [{status}] Resisted false claim: {resists_claim}")

    passed = sum(1 for r in results if r["passed"])
    total = len(results)

    return {
        "category": "adversarial_resistance",
        "passed": passed,
        "total": total,
        "accuracy": passed / total if total > 0 else 0,
        "details": results
    }


def evaluate_completeness(model, tokenizer, test_cases: list) -> dict:
    """Evaluate protocol completeness - does model detect all missing steps?"""
    print("\n" + "="*60)
    print("EVALUATING: Protocol Completeness")
    print("="*60)

    results = []

    # Key missing steps that should be detected
    key_steps = {
        "comp_001": ["dnase", "reverse transcription", "rt", "cdna"],
        "comp_002": ["transfer", "blot", "membrane transfer"]
    }

    for i, case in enumerate(test_cases):
        question = case["conversations"][0]["content"]
        expected = case["conversations"][1]["content"]
        case_id = case["id"]

        print(f"\n[{i+1}] Testing completeness: {case_id}...")
        response = generate_response(model, tokenizer, question, max_new_tokens=800)

        # Check if key missing steps are detected
        expected_steps = key_steps.get(case_id, [])
        response_lower = response.lower()
        detected = [step for step in expected_steps if step in response_lower]
        detection_rate = len(detected) / len(expected_steps) if expected_steps else 0

        result = {
            "id": case_id,
            "question": question[:100],
            "expected_steps": expected_steps,
            "detected_steps": detected,
            "response": response[:600],
            "detection_rate": detection_rate,
            "passed": detection_rate >= 0.5  # Pass if at least half detected
        }
        results.append(result)

        status = "PASS" if result["passed"] else "FAIL"
        print(f"    [{status}] Detected {len(detected)}/{len(expected_steps)} key steps")

    passed = sum(1 for r in results if r["passed"])
    total = len(results)

    return {
        "category": "protocol_completeness",
        "passed": passed,
        "total": total,
        "accuracy": passed / total if total > 0 else 0,
        "details": results
    }


def evaluate_fact_recall(model, tokenizer, test_cases: list) -> dict:
    """Evaluate fact recall - does model remember key trained facts?"""
    print("\n" + "="*60)
    print("EVALUATING: Fact Recall")
    print("="*60)

    results = []

    # Key facts and values that should be recalled
    key_facts = {
        "fact_001": ["52%", "52 percent"],
        "fact_002": ["52%", "52 percent"],
        "fact_003": ["52%", "8%"],
        "fact_004": ["-1.60", "-1.6", "suppressed", "suppression"],
        "fact_005": ["liver", "-1.60", "-1.6", "opposite"]
    }

    for i, case in enumerate(test_cases):
        question = case["conversations"][0]["content"]
        expected = case["conversations"][1]["content"]
        case_id = case["id"]

        print(f"\n[{i+1}] Testing fact recall: {case_id}...")
        response = generate_response(model, tokenizer, question)

        # Check if key facts are present
        expected_facts = key_facts.get(case_id, [])
        response_lower = response.lower()
        recalled = [fact for fact in expected_facts if fact.lower() in response_lower]
        recall_rate = len(recalled) / len(expected_facts) if expected_facts else 0

        result = {
            "id": case_id,
            "question": question,
            "expected_facts": expected_facts,
            "recalled_facts": recalled,
            "response": response[:400],
            "recall_rate": recall_rate,
            "passed": recall_rate >= 0.5  # Pass if at least half recalled
        }
        results.append(result)

        status = "PASS" if result["passed"] else "FAIL"
        print(f"    [{status}] Recalled {len(recalled)}/{len(expected_facts)} key facts")

    passed = sum(1 for r in results if r["passed"])
    total = len(results)

    return {
        "category": "fact_recall",
        "passed": passed,
        "total": total,
        "accuracy": passed / total if total > 0 else 0,
        "details": results
    }


def main():
    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Evaluate ecosystem-improved model")
    parser.add_argument("--model", type=str, default="./ecosystem_improved_model",
                        help="Path to the fine-tuned model")
    parser.add_argument("--base-model", type=str, default="mistralai/Mistral-7B-v0.3",
                        help="Base model name")
    parser.add_argument("--test-data", type=str, default="data/ecosystem_failures_training.json",
                        help="Path to test data JSON")
    parser.add_argument("--output", type=str, default=None,
                        help="Output path for results JSON")
    parser.add_argument("--no-4bit", action="store_true",
                        help="Disable 4-bit quantization")

    args = parser.parse_args()

    print("="*60)
    print("BioRLHF Ecosystem Model Evaluation")
    print("="*60)
    print(f"Model:      {args.model}")
    print(f"Base:       {args.base_model}")
    print(f"Test data:  {args.test_data}")
    print(f"Time:       {datetime.now().isoformat()}")
    print("="*60)

    # Load test data
    with open(args.test_data, 'r') as f:
        test_data = json.load(f)

    # Load model
    model, tokenizer = load_model(args.model, args.base_model, use_4bit=not args.no_4bit)
    print("\nModel loaded successfully!\n")

    # Run evaluations
    results = {}

    # 1. Calibration
    if test_data.get("calibration_examples"):
        results["calibration"] = evaluate_calibration(
            model, tokenizer, test_data["calibration_examples"]
        )

    # 2. Adversarial resistance
    if test_data.get("adversarial_resistance_examples"):
        results["adversarial"] = evaluate_adversarial(
            model, tokenizer, test_data["adversarial_resistance_examples"]
        )

    # 3. Protocol completeness
    if test_data.get("completeness_examples"):
        results["completeness"] = evaluate_completeness(
            model, tokenizer, test_data["completeness_examples"]
        )

    # 4. Fact recall
    if test_data.get("fact_drilling_examples"):
        results["fact_recall"] = evaluate_fact_recall(
            model, tokenizer, test_data["fact_drilling_examples"]
        )

    # Summary
    print("\n" + "="*60)
    print("EVALUATION SUMMARY")
    print("="*60)

    total_passed = 0
    total_tests = 0

    for category, data in results.items():
        print(f"\n{category.upper()}:")
        print(f"  Passed: {data['passed']}/{data['total']} ({data['accuracy']:.1%})")
        total_passed += data['passed']
        total_tests += data['total']

    overall_accuracy = total_passed / total_tests if total_tests > 0 else 0

    print("\n" + "-"*60)
    print(f"OVERALL: {total_passed}/{total_tests} ({overall_accuracy:.1%})")
    print("-"*60)

    # Save results
    output_path = args.output or f"ecosystem_eval_results_{datetime.now().strftime('%Y%m%d_%H%M%S')}.json"

    output_data = {
        "model_path": args.model,
        "base_model": args.base_model,
        "evaluation_date": datetime.now().isoformat(),
        "overall_accuracy": overall_accuracy,
        "total_passed": total_passed,
        "total_tests": total_tests,
        "results": results
    }

    with open(output_path, 'w') as f:
        json.dump(output_data, f, indent=2)

    print(f"\nResults saved to: {output_path}")
    print("\n" + "="*60)
    print("Evaluation complete!")
    print("="*60)


if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()