Knowing Isn't Understanding: Re-grounding Generative Proactivity with Epistemic and Behavioral Insight
Abstract
Generative AI agents equate understanding with resolving explicit queries, an assumption that confines interaction to what users can articulate. This assumption breaks down when users themselves lack awareness of what is missing, risky, or worth considering. In such conditions, proactivity is not merely an efficiency enhancement, but an epistemic necessity. We refer to this condition as epistemic incompleteness: where progress depends on engaging with unknown unknowns for effective partnership. Existing approaches to proactivity remain narrowly anticipatory, extrapolating from past behavior and presuming that goals are already well defined, thereby failing to support users meaningfully. However, surfacing possibilities beyond a user's current awareness is not inherently beneficial. Unconstrained proactive interventions can misdirect attention, overwhelm users, or introduce harm. Proactive agents, therefore, require behavioral grounding: principled constraints on when, how, and to what extent an agent should intervene. We advance the position that generative proactivity must be grounded both epistemically and behaviorally. Drawing on the philosophy of ignorance and research on proactive behavior, we argue that these theories offer critical guidance for designing agents that can engage responsibly and foster meaningful partnerships.
Community
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- Position: Human-Centric AI Requires a Minimum Viable Level of Human Understanding (2026)
- PrefIx: Understand and Adapt to User Preference in Human-Agent Interaction (2026)
- Epistemological Fault Lines Between Human and Artificial Intelligence (2025)
- Current Agents Fail to Leverage World Model as Tool for Foresight (2026)
- Position: Introspective Experience from Conversational Environments as a Path to Better Learning (2026)
- Explicit Cognitive Allocation: A Principle for Governed and Auditable Inference in Large Language Models (2026)
- Thinking Makes LLM Agents Introverted: How Mandatory Thinking Can Backfire in User-Engaged Agents (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment:
@librarian-bot
recommend
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper
