Rethinking Token Reweighting for SFT: Suppress, Reverse, and Extrapolate Learned Features
Abstract
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) learns most aggressively from tokens that the model deems least likely. This helps acquire new behaviors, but also amplifies noisy or conflicting supervision and can overwrite useful pretrained knowledge. Through a unified policy-loss view, we revisit existing token-reweighting methods and show that they assign nonnegative coefficients to demonstrated tokens. Consequently, they can suppress or amplify supervised updates, but cannot reverse harmful features once learned. Moreover, larger training weights do not amount to feature extrapolation, since they change the optimization trajectory rather than scale a fixed SFT direction. We argue that reversal and extrapolation require a stable reference frame defined by a fixed SFT delta. Motivated by this, we propose SCALE (Selective Control of Adaptation via Local Entropy), an entropy-guided adaptation-strength-control method that freezes the pretrained model and the SFT delta and learns bounded token- and module-specific gates by minimizing predictive entropy alone. These gates suppress, reverse, or extrapolate frozen SFT features according to their alignment with entropy reduction. Across Qwen2.5-Math-1.5B, Qwen2.5-Math-7B, and Qwen3-4B-Base, SCALE achieves mathematical-reasoning averages of 37.84, 43.60, and 36.57, exceeding the strongest corresponding baselines while remaining competitive on general-retention benchmarks. It also attains the best average code-generation performance across HumanEval, HumanEval+, and MBPP for all three models. These results suggest that effective SFT correction can benefit from controlling how already learned residuals are used, rather than only modifying how they are learned.
Community
Effective SFT correction is not just about how residuals are learned, but how they are used. SCALE freezes the pretrained model and SFT delta, learns entropy-guided gates to suppress, reverse, or extrapolate SFT features, and beats baselines on math reasoning and code generation.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- Weightless Fine-Tuning: Personalizing LLMs via Logit-Space Transport (2026)
- Look Before You Select: Rethinking Vocabulary Sparsification in On-Policy Distillation (2026)
- ForkLeft: Entropy-First Rollouts for Prefix-Aligned Autoregressive-to-Diffusion Distillation (2026)
- ACLArena: Agent Continue Learning in Multi-stage Post-training (2026)
- Subliminal Learning as Trait-Direction Drift: A Mechanism and Targeted Control under SFT Distillation (2026)
- PG-SFT: Balancing Capability Acquisition and Retention in Offline Agent Fine-Tuning (2026)
- SoFT: Soft Targets for Generalizable LLM Fine-Tuning (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2609.33463 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper