Papers
arxiv:2609.35505

An RL View of OPD: Least Square Policy Distillation for Sample-Efficient LLM Reasoning

Published on Sep 28
· Submitted by
Shangzhe Li
on Sep 29
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

We study on-policy distillation (OPD) through the lens of reinforcement learning, establishing a connection between the reverse-KL objective in OPD and KL-regularized policy optimization. Building on this connection, we introduce Least-Square Policy Distillation (LSPD), an RL-inspired framework that brings optimistic exploration and off-policy data reuse from value-based RL into policy distillation. LSPD preserves policy diversity through exploration while improving rollout efficiency by repeatedly learning from previously collected trajectories. Our theoretical analysis connects LSPD to optimistic value-based learning and shows that its idealized formulation achieves a sharp mathcal O(log K) regret bound under online exploration. Empirically, LSPD consistently outperforms existing distillation baselines across six mathematical reasoning benchmarks and diverse teacher-student settings, with average gains of +1.59 points in Avg@16. Remarkably, through Pass@k evaluations up to k=64, we found that LSPD better preserves policy diversity by achieving stronger performance as k grows. Its fully off-policy variant achieves comparable performance to vanilla OPD using only the first 25% of rollout batches. Together, these results provide an RL perspective on OPD that offers both a principled interpretation and a practical route toward more effective and rollout-efficient language model distillation.

Community

Paper author Paper submitter
•
edited about 23 hours ago

LSPD: An RL View of On-Policy Distillation

On-policy distillation (OPD) is commonly implemented with policy-gradient updates. But its reverse-KL objective also has an exact interpretation as KL-regularized reinforcement learning, with a reward defined by the teacher relative to a reference policy. This raises a natural question: can value-based RL principles make policy distillation more sample-efficient?

We introduce Least Square Policy Distillation (LSPD), motivated by optimistic reward estimation and KL-regularized policy improvement. Rather than using teacher feedback only to drive policy-gradient updates, LSPD directly matches student and teacher log probabilities through a robust least-squares objective. This formulation enables learning from accumulated experience, bringing a central advantage of value-based RL to LLM distillation. Our theoretical analysis establishes logarithmic reverse-KL regret for an idealized optimistic formulation.

Across six mathematical reasoning benchmarks and three teacher–student settings, LSPD improves reasoning performance and multi-sample solution coverage. Its replay-based variant, LSPD-RB, achieves performance comparable to vanilla OPD with approximately one-quarter of the rollout batches. The broader message: viewing distillation as an RL problem opens up algorithmic choices beyond on-policy policy gradients—and opportunities to learn more from each interaction with the teacher.

📄 Paper · 💻 Code

Paper author Paper submitter
•
This comment has been hidden

This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.

The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API

Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!

If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space

You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2609.35505
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.35505 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.35505 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.35505 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.