WorldAuditBench: Interactive 3D World Auditing with Multimodal Agents
Abstract
As interactive 3D worlds are increasingly used to study intelligent behavior, it becomes important to develop efficient pipelines for identifying anomalies in these simulated environments, such as floating objects, traversable walls, or objects inconsistent with the surrounding scene. Multimodal AI systems, including vision-language models (VLMs) and vision-language-action models (VLAs), have shown potential for automating this task. However, 3D world auditing is complex, requiring the close coupling of two distinct capabilities: action, to navigate the 3D world and search for anomalies systematically and efficiently; and visual reasoning, to understand the environment and identify anomalies from multimodal observations. It remains largely unexplored whether multimodal agents can effectively couple these two capabilities, using visual reasoning to identify potential anomalies while taking actions to validate them. In this paper, we introduce WorldAuditBench, a benchmark for 3D world auditing comprising 213 anomaly tasks across 13 environments built with Unreal Engine 5 and Three.js, spanning five anomaly families. We evaluate five frontier models under a fixed exploration budget using two auditing paradigms: VLA-based exploration followed by VLM-based anomaly identification, and an end-to-end VLM agent in which visual reasoning directly guides action selection. Across the evaluated models and two paradigms, success rates range from 6.6% to 42.3%, substantially below human performance (83.4%). Through the task of world auditing, WorldAuditBench provides a testbed for studying how multimodal agents couple action and visual reasoning in interactive 3D environments, while highlighting current limitations in their ability to gather and interpret evidence during exploration.
Community
We introduce WorldAuditBench, a benchmark with 213 tasks across 13 interactive 3D environments that tests whether multimodal agents can explore, investigate, and identify world anomalies.
This is an automated message from the ResearchStudio team.
We created an interactive ResearchStudio Reel for this paper. It includes a visual poster, a video, and a blog, all available for download in editable formats.
Open the ResearchStudio Reel →
Download all files from Hugging Face
Please give this comment a thumbs up if you find the Reel helpful!
Want to explore or create Reels for more papers? Visit the ResearchStudio demo.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- Code4Scene: Benchmarking Coding Agents for Constructing and Editing 3D Scenes (2026)
- VABench: Measuring Embodied Spatial Intelligence through Visual Demonstrations, Active Perception, and Metric Control (2026)
- UrbanGround: From Local Perception to Spatial Agency in a Real-Scale City (2026)
- CodeActionBench: Evaluating Agentic Code-as-Policy for Embodied Manipulation (2026)
- VibeWorlding: Can Multimodal Agents Construct 3D Open Worlds End-to-End? (2026)
- VCN-Bench: A Video-Contextualized Navigation Benchmark for Spatial Reasoning over Prior Visual Experience (2026)
- 360CityArena: A Realistic Virtual Urban Navigation Benchmark for Embodied Agents (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
