Stability Comparison: Agents-A1 vs Nex-N2-mini under Q5_K_M Quantization

#12
by BipedalBit - opened

When using the Q5_K_M quantized version (LordNeel/Agents-A1-GGUF, bartowski/nex-agi_Nex-N2-mini-GGUF) for both models with the same llama.cpp settings (-ctk q4_0 -ctv q4_0 --ctx-size 196608) and the chat_template from froggeric/Qwen-Fixed-Chat-Templates, I observed that in the hermes-agent conversation mode for complex troubleshooting scenarios, the stability of Agents-A1 during long-horizon multi-turn tool calls is inferior to that of Nex-N2-mini. And I've switched my primary hermes-agent model back to Nex-N2-mini.
Sorry, I can't share the actual conversation logs that show the difference—they're tightly coupled with my private deployment and ops setup.

Intern Science org

When using the Q5_K_M quantized version (LordNeel/Agents-A1-GGUF, bartowski/nex-agi_Nex-N2-mini-GGUF) for both models with the same llama.cpp settings (-ctk q4_0 -ctv q4_0 --ctx-size 196608) and the chat_template from froggeric/Qwen-Fixed-Chat-Templates, I observed that in the hermes-agent conversation mode for complex troubleshooting scenarios, the stability of Agents-A1 during long-horizon multi-turn tool calls is inferior to that of Nex-N2-mini. And I've switched my primary hermes-agent model back to Nex-N2-mini.
Sorry, I can't share the actual conversation logs that show the difference—they're tightly coupled with my private deployment and ops setup.

Thanks a lot for your sharing! We're really happy to hear about your real-world feedback and from other community devs too, and we totally get that you can't share full conversations due to privacy concerns. If possible, though, we'd love it if you could share some of your task descriptions, or point out which specific tools had failed calls. That would really help us deliver better open-source models for the community!

Sign up or log in to comment