Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
id
stringlengths
5
8
name
stringlengths
9
3.31k
name_abbreviation
stringlengths
7
147
decision_date
stringlengths
4
10
docket_number
stringlengths
0
178
first_page
stringclasses
928 values
last_page
stringclasses
933 values
citations
stringlengths
8
14
volume
stringclasses
784 values
reporter
stringclasses
2 values
court
stringclasses
2 values
jurisdiction
stringclasses
1 value
last_updated
stringclasses
786 values
provenance
stringclasses
3 values
judges
stringlengths
0
328
parties
stringlengths
0
3.31k
head_matter
stringlengths
0
47.6k
word_count
stringlengths
0
5
char_count
stringlengths
1
6
text
stringlengths
0
151k
6808833
Tyler Neil ERICKSON, Petitioner, v. Austin Richard EARLEY, Respondent and Appellant
Erickson v. Earley
2016-04-20
No. 27590
631
635
878 N.W.2d 631
878
North Western Reporter 2d
South Dakota Supreme Court
South Dakota
2021-08-10T17:20:21.136678+00:00
CAP
' [¶ 20.] GILBERTSON, Chief Justice, and ZINTER, SEVERSON, and KERN, Justices, concur.
Tyler Neil ERICKSON, Petitioner, v. Austin Richard EARLEY, Respondent and Appellant.
2016 S.D. 37 Tyler Neil ERICKSON, Petitioner, v. Austin Richard EARLEY, Respondent and Appellant. No. 27590. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Considered on Briefs March 21, 2016. Decided April 20, 2016. Tyler Neil Erickson, Pro se petitioner. Reed T. Mahlke of Helsper, McCarty, Mahlke & Kleinjan, P.C., Brookings, South D...
1847
11541
WILBUR, Justice. [¶ 1.] Austin Earley appeals from a circuit court order granting Tyler Erickson a permanent order of protection. Earley contends that the circuit court abused its discretion by granting the protection order and that the protection order violates his First Amendment right to free speech. We affirm. Fact...
10673161
The PEOPLE of the State of South Dakota, In the Interest of S.L.H., a Minor Child and Concerning F.H.O. and P.H.
People ex rel. S.L.H.
1983-12-21
No. 14095
672
681
342 N.W.2d 672
342
North Western Reporter 2d
South Dakota Supreme Court
South Dakota
2021-08-10T17:19:40.649466+00:00
CAP
FOSHEIM, C.J., and MORGAN, J., concur.
The PEOPLE of the State of South Dakota, In the Interest of S.L.H., a Minor Child and Concerning F.H.O. and P.H.
The PEOPLE of the State of South Dakota, In the Interest of S.L.H., a Minor Child and Concerning F.H.O. and P.H. No. 14095. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Argued Sept. 14, 1983. Decided Dec. 21, 1983. Rehearing Denied Jan. 31, 1984. Roberta Jean Earley, Spearfish, for appellant F.H.O. William E. Anderson, Belle Fourche...
5221
31975
WOLLMAN, Justice This is an appeal from an order of adjudication of dependency and neglect and a decree of disposition terminating appellant-mother’s parental rights. The circuit court entered the order and decree subsequent to our remanding the case with instructions to conform to the “clear and convincing” evi-dentia...
10593978
Barbara WHITSON and Jim Oliff, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. Dale G. LENDE and Cheryl A. Lende, Defendants and Appellants
Whitson v. Lende
1989-06-28
Nos. 16436, 16455
267
271
442 N.W.2d 267
442
North Western Reporter 2d
South Dakota Supreme Court
South Dakota
2021-08-10T17:25:14.515411+00:00
CAP
All the Justices concur.
Barbara WHITSON and Jim Oliff, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. Dale G. LENDE and Cheryl A. Lende, Defendants and Appellants.
Barbara WHITSON and Jim Oliff, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. Dale G. LENDE and Cheryl A. Lende, Defendants and Appellants. Nos. 16436, 16455. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Considered on Briefs April 27, 1989. Decided June 28, 1989. Thomas E. Brady of Richards, Hood & Brady, Spearfish, for plaintiffs and appel-lees. Har...
2047
12546
MILLER, Justice. This is a contract rescission action in which we generally uphold the trial court’s monetary award of restitution, but remand to have the court additionally ascertain the reasonable rental value of the property involved. FACTS Appellants Dale and Cheryl Lende (Lendes) appeal from a circuit court judgme...
10611494
STATE of South Dakota, ex rel. V.K.H., Mother, and M.J.H., a Minor Child, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. S.W., Defendant and Appellee
State ex rel. V.K.H. v. S.W.
1989-06-28
No. 16065
920
926
442 N.W.2d 920
442
North Western Reporter 2d
South Dakota Supreme Court
South Dakota
2021-08-10T17:25:14.515411+00:00
CAP
MORGAN, J., concurs.
STATE of South Dakota, ex rel. V.K.H., Mother, and M.J.H., a Minor Child, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. S.W., Defendant and Appellee.
STATE of South Dakota, ex rel. V.K.H., Mother, and M.J.H., a Minor Child, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. S.W., Defendant and Appellee. No. 16065. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Considered on Briefs Oct. 14, 1988. Decided June 28, 1989. Lloyd J. Mahan of Mahan Law Offices, Parkston, for plaintiff and appellant; Keith Goehr...
2996
18242
HENDERSON, Justice. PARTIES/PROCEDURAL HISTORY Defendant/father S.W. (father) was determined by a jury to be the father of M.J.H. (son) in a paternity action, initiated in the circuit court for Hutchinson County by V.K.H. (mother). The trial court issued its judgment on July 8, 1986, ordering father to pay, by Septembe...
10593698
STATE of South Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Alvin H. GOODROAD, Defendant and Appellant
State v. Goodroad
1989-06-21
No. 16372
246
252
442 N.W.2d 246
442
North Western Reporter 2d
South Dakota Supreme Court
South Dakota
2021-08-10T17:25:14.515411+00:00
CAP
MORGAN and HENDERSON, JJ., concur.
STATE of South Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Alvin H. GOODROAD, Defendant and Appellant.
STATE of South Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Alvin H. GOODROAD, Defendant and Appellant. No. 16372. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Considered on Briefs April 27, 1989. Decided June 21, 1989. Frank E. Geaghan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Pierre, for plaintiff and appellee; Roger A. Tellinghuisen, Atty. Gen., Pierre, on the b...
2580
16201
WUEST, Chief Justice. Defendant, Alvin H. Goodroad, was found guilty of possessing one-half pound or more of marijuana, in violation of SDCL 22-42-6. He was sentenced to two years imprisonment in the South Dakota State Penitentiary. We affirm defendant’s conviction. In February, 1988, a South Dakota Division of Crimina...
10593470
In the Matter of the Termination of the Franchise Agreement Between GROSETH INTERNATIONAL, INC., and International Harvester
In re the Termination of the Franchise Agreement between Groseth International, Inc.
1989-06-14
Nos. 15944, 15962
229
233
442 N.W.2d 229
442
North Western Reporter 2d
South Dakota Supreme Court
South Dakota
2021-08-10T17:25:14.515411+00:00
CAP
MORGAN, HENDERSON, and, MILLER, JJ., concur.
In the Matter of the Termination of the Franchise Agreement Between GROSETH INTERNATIONAL, INC., and International Harvester.
In the Matter of the Termination of the Franchise Agreement Between GROSETH INTERNATIONAL, INC., and International Harvester. Nos. 15944, 15962. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Considered on Briefs March 20, 1989. Decided June 14, 1989. Celia Miner of Brady, Reade & Johnson, Yankton, for appellant, Groseth Intern., Inc....
2736
16797
WUEST, Chief Justice. Groseth International, Inc. (Groseth), a South Dakota corporation, appeals a circuit court order granting the petition of International Harvester (IH) which sought the termination of a franchise agreement between it and Groseth. We affirm the circuit court’s decision. Until 1985, Groseth was a fra...
10598089
Gary NIELSEN and Diana M. Nielsen, d/b/a Noah's Critters, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Terrence W. McCABE and Cynthia M. McCabe, d/b/a Noah's Critters of Watertown, South Dakota, and Oscar Nygaard, Defendants and Appellees
Nielsen v. McCabe
1989-06-28
No. 16318
477
482
442 N.W.2d 477
442
North Western Reporter 2d
South Dakota Supreme Court
South Dakota
2021-08-10T17:25:14.515411+00:00
CAP
Gary NIELSEN and Diana M. Nielsen, d/b/a Noah’s Critters, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Terrence W. McCABE and Cynthia M. McCabe, d/b/a Noah’s Critters of Watertown, South Dakota, and Oscar Nygaard, Defendants and Appellees.
Gary NIELSEN and Diana M. Nielsen, d/b/a Noah’s Critters, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Terrence W. McCABE and Cynthia M. McCabe, d/b/a Noah’s Critters of Watertown, South Dakota, and Oscar Nygaard, Defendants and Appellees. No. 16318. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Argued March 21, 1989. Decided June 28, 1989. Daniel ...
2252
14051
MORGAN, Justice. Gary and Diana Nielsen (Nielsen) appeal from a judgment entered against them in their unlawful detainer action against Terrence and Cynthia McCabe (McCabe) and from a declaratory judgment holding that their lease agreement with Oscar Nygaard (Nygaard) was null and void. We affirm in part, reverse in pa...
10598017
John Mark VELLINGA, Plaintiff and Appellant. v. Delores Ann VELLINGA, Defendant and Appellee
Vellinga v. Vellinga
1989-06-21
No. 16139
472
477
442 N.W.2d 472
442
North Western Reporter 2d
South Dakota Supreme Court
South Dakota
2021-08-10T17:25:14.515411+00:00
CAP
MORGAN, SABERS and MILLER, JJ., concur.
John Mark VELLINGA, Plaintiff and Appellant. v. Delores Ann VELLINGA, Defendant and Appellee.
John Mark VELLINGA, Plaintiff and Appellant. v. Delores Ann VELLINGA, Defendant and Appellee. No. 16139. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Considered on Briefs Jan. 9, 1989. Decided June 21, 1989. Gary J. Pashby and Michael S. McKnight of Boyce, Murphy, McDowell & Greenfield, Sioux Falls, for plaintiff and appellant. Lee ...
3290
20594
McMURCHIE, Circuit Judge. Husband appeals the trial court’s denial of his request for retroactive modification of his child support obligation and claims the trial court erred in interpreting the terms of his obligation and in calculating arrearages. FACTS John (husband) and Delores (wife) Vellin-ga were divorced in 19...
6914225
Frank ASHLEY, Petitioner, v. Darin YOUNG, Warden of the South Dakota State Penitentiary, Respondent
Ashley v. Young
2014-09-17
No. 27085
347
352
854 N.W.2d 347
854
North Western Reporter 2d
South Dakota Supreme Court
South Dakota
2021-08-10T17:28:38.712524+00:00
CAP
11 13.] GILBERTSON, Chief Justice, and KONENKAMP, SEVERSON, and WILBUR, Justices, concur.
Frank ASHLEY, Petitioner, v. Darin YOUNG, Warden of the South Dakota State Penitentiary, Respondent.
2014 S.D. 66 Frank ASHLEY, Petitioner, v. Darin YOUNG, Warden of the South Dakota State Penitentiary, Respondent. No. 27085. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Considered on Briefs Aug. 14, 2014. Decided Sept. 17, 2014. John R. Murphy, Murphy Law Office, PC, Rapid City, South Dakota, Attorneys for petitioner. Marty J. Jaek...
2342
14494
ZINTER, Justice. [¶ 1.] Frank Ashley moved this Court for a certificate of probable cause (CPC) to appeal the circuit court’s denial of his petition for habeas corpus. In denying the motion, we clarify the standard of review and showing necessary for applicants to obtain CPCs from this Court. Facts and Procedural Histo...
9372597
Melanie REGALADO, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Ardith Jean Ferguson MATHIESON, Defendant and Appellant
Regalado v. Mathieson
2004-06-30
No. 23026
67
74
684 N.W.2d 67
684
North Western Reporter 2d
South Dakota Supreme Court
South Dakota
2021-08-10T17:25:00.977575+00:00
CAP
[¶ 21.] SABERS, KONENKAMP, ZINTER, and MEIERHENRY, Justices, concur.
Melanie REGALADO, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Ardith Jean Ferguson MATHIESON, Defendant and Appellant.
2004 SD 87 Melanie REGALADO, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Ardith Jean Ferguson MATHIESON, Defendant and Appellant. No. 23026. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Considered on Briefs June 1, 2004. Decided June 30, 2004. Stanley E. Whiting, Winner, South Dakota, Attorney for plaintiff and appellee. Neil Carsrud, Dakota Plains ...
3222
20180
GILBERTSON, Chief Justice. [¶ 1.] Mother appeals from a trial court’s dismissal of an action initiated by Grandmother pursuant to SDCL 25-5-29 et seq. seeking custody of Mother’s two children, T.H.M and M.M.M. On appeal, Mother argues the trial court abused its discretion when it dismissed the action based on its findi...
9372745
Wallace ADRIAN, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Rich McKINNIE and Lynn McKinnie, Defendants and Appellants, Citibank (South Dakota), NA, and Adrian Ranch, L.L.C., Defendants
Adrian v. McKinnie
2004-06-30
No. 22860
91
100
684 N.W.2d 91
684
North Western Reporter 2d
South Dakota Supreme Court
South Dakota
2021-08-10T17:25:00.977575+00:00
CAP
[¶ 22.] GILBERTSON, Chief Justice, and SABERS, KONENKAMP, and ZINTER, Justices, concur.
Wallace ADRIAN, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Rich McKINNIE and Lynn McKinnie, Defendants and Appellants, Citibank (South Dakota), NA, and Adrian Ranch, L.L.C., Defendants.
2004 SD 84 Wallace ADRIAN, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Rich McKINNIE and Lynn McKinnie, Defendants and Appellants, Citibank (South Dakota), NA, and Adrian Ranch, L.L.C., Defendants. No. 22860. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Considered on Briefs April 26, 2004. Decided June 30, 2004. Michael A. Wilson of Barker, Wilson, ...
4347
26058
MEIERHENRY, Justice. [¶ 1.] This case is before us for the second time. In the first case, we de termined that the parties’ contractual agreement was an equitable mortgage and reversed and remanded for further proceedings. On remand, Wallace Adrian (Adrian) sought foreclosure of the equitable mortgage. The trial court ...
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

No dataset card yet

Downloads last month
20